7,596 domínios analisados · 20 categorias · Gratuito e instantâneo

Comparar dominios

Compare valor do site, trafego, SEO e sinais de hosting lado a lado.

Ver rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

rudderstack.com 0 supabase.co 2
supabase.co leads in :lane
supabase.co wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business: supabase.co Reach: supabase.co SEO: Balanced Performance: Balanced Trust: Balanced
Business
supabase.co
rudderstack.com
0
supabase.co
5
Value gap $1,984,545
Income gap $110
Reach
supabase.co
rudderstack.com
0
supabase.co
3
Visitors gap 3,478
Pageviews gap 12,173
SEO
Balanced
rudderstack.com
0
supabase.co
0
Performance
Balanced
rudderstack.com
0
supabase.co
0
Trust
Balanced
rudderstack.com
0
supabase.co
0

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

rudderstack.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
3 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve internal linking depth
Architecture 23 internal links behind
Why: The competing domain exposes more internal links from the homepage and looks easier to crawl.
Do next: Expose more important pages through clearer internal links and navigation paths.
Expand structured data coverage
Structured data 2 schema blocks behind
Why: supabase.co uses more structured data blocks, which can improve machine understanding and rich result coverage.
Do next: Add clean schema markup for the brand, organization and key page entities.
supabase.co
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
1 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Metrica rudderstack.com Vencedor supabase.co
Valor estimado $112,777,358 supabase.co $114,761,903
Visitantes diários 9,318 supabase.co 12,796
Visualizações diárias 32,613 supabase.co 44,786
Receita diária $294 supabase.co $403
SEO Score 92 — 92
Indexability 100 — 100
OnPage 91 — 91
Performance 100 — 100
Trust 65 — 65
Coverage 90 — 90
Confidence 91 — 91
SEO Freshness (h) 384 supabase.co 1
Country United States — United States
TLD com — co
Categoria — — —
Registrador GoDaddy.com, LLC — —
Internal Links 52 supabase.co 75
Structured Data Blocks 2 supabase.co 4
PageSpeed Mobile — — —
PageSpeed Desktop — — —
PageRank 4 rudderstack.com 3
Posição Tranco #3,099 supabase.co #1,088
Nota SSL A — A
Status de segurança — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

rudderstack.com
92/100
Pass 10 Warn 1 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 91 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
48 Pass
Description Length
152 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
3/67 Warn
supabase.co
92/100
Pass 10 Warn 1 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 91 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
44 Pass
Description Length
159 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
6/57 Warn

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve image ALT coverage
MEDIUM Impact 5 Effort M Confidence 84% Focus area Both
A: 5 | B: 5
Why it matters: Missing ALT text reduces accessibility and image search context.
Recommended fix: Add concise descriptive ALT text for informative images and empty ALT for decorative assets.

Proximos caminhos de descoberta

Use os sinais comparados para abrir hubs mais amplos e conjuntos de oportunidades SEO de alto valor.

Hubs meta →