7,596 domínios analisados · 20 categorias · Gratuito e instantâneo

Comparar dominios

Compare valor do site, trafego, SEO e sinais de hosting lado a lado.

Ver rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

nest.com 2 so.com 3
so.com leads in :lane
so.com wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business: so.com Reach: so.com SEO: nest.com Performance: so.com Trust: nest.com
Business
so.com
nest.com
0
so.com
5
Value gap $35,679
Income gap $0
Reach
so.com
nest.com
0
so.com
3
Visitors gap 5.0
Pageviews gap 17
SEO
nest.com
nest.com
5
so.com
0
Seo gap 28
Indexability gap 25
Performance
so.com
nest.com
0
so.com
2
Performance gap 10
Trust
nest.com
nest.com
2
so.com
0
Trust gap 29

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

nest.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
2 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Lift technical performance
Performance 10 points behind
Why: Speed or rendering signals lag behind the competing domain and may hold back SEO quality.
Do next: Improve Core Web Vitals, image delivery and frontend payload before the next refresh.
so.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
4 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 57 points behind
Why: nest.com has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 28 points to match
Why: nest.com trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Improve indexability signals
Indexability 25 points behind
Why: :domain is behind on crawlability or indexability checks that directly affect discoverability.
Do next: Fix robots, sitemap, canonical and index directives so the homepage is cleanly discoverable.
Metrica nest.com Vencedor so.com
Valor estimado $125,108,776 so.com $125,144,455
Visitantes diários 10,895 so.com 10,900
Visualizações diárias 38,133 so.com 38,150
Receita diária $343 so.com $343
SEO Score 89 nest.com 61
Indexability 100 nest.com 75
OnPage 88 nest.com 31
Performance 90 so.com 100
Trust 65 nest.com 36
Coverage 100 nest.com 76
Confidence 100 nest.com 79
SEO Freshness (h) 331 nest.com 1,089
Country United States — United States
TLD com — com
Categoria — — —
Registrador MarkMonitor Inc. — eName Technology Co., Ltd.
Internal Links 234 nest.com 44
Structured Data Blocks 1 nest.com 0
PageSpeed Mobile 75 nest.com —
PageSpeed Desktop 95 nest.com —
PageRank 5 nest.com 3
Posição Tranco #2,679 so.com #2,267
Nota SSL A — A
Status de segurança — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

nest.com
89/100
Pass 10 Warn 1 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 88 PERF 90 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
34 Pass
Description Length
157 Pass
HTML lang
en-US Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
35/188 Warn
so.com
61/100
Pass 4 Warn 6 Fail 1 IDX 75 ONP 31 PERF 100 TRUST 36
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Missing Warn
Canonical URL
Missing Warn
H1 Count
0 Fail
Title Length
10 Warn
Description Length
78 Pass
HTML lang
Missing Warn
Viewport Meta
Missing Warn
Image Alt Coverage
1/8 Warn

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Add one H1 heading
HIGH Impact 10 Effort S Confidence 90% Focus area so.com
A: 0 | B: 10
Why it matters: Missing H1 weakens topical hierarchy for users and crawlers.
Recommended fix: Add exactly one descriptive H1 aligned with page intent.
Publish XML sitemap
MEDIUM Impact 7 Effort S Confidence 84% Focus area so.com
A: 0 | B: 7
Why it matters: A sitemap improves URL discovery and recrawl efficiency.
Recommended fix: Generate /sitemap.xml, include canonical URLs, and keep it auto-updated.
Increase homepage content depth
MEDIUM Impact 6 Effort M Confidence 79% Focus area so.com
A: 0 | B: 6
Why it matters: Thin content limits topical coverage and relevance context.
Recommended fix: Expand helpful unique copy that answers key user questions and links to deeper pages.
Add canonical URL
MEDIUM Impact 6 Effort S Confidence 85% Focus area so.com
A: 0 | B: 6
Why it matters: Canonical tags prevent duplicate URL confusion and consolidate ranking signals.
Recommended fix: Set a self-referencing canonical on indexable pages and avoid cross-canonical mistakes.

Proximos caminhos de descoberta

Use os sinais comparados para abrir hubs mais amplos e conjuntos de oportunidades SEO de alto valor.

Hubs meta →