7,595 domínios analisados · 20 categorias · Gratuito e instantâneo

Comparar dominios

Compare valor do site, trafego, SEO e sinais de hosting lado a lado.

Ver rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

fidelity.com 2 jd.com 2
:lane is currently balanced
Both domains perform similarly across the weighted signals in this lane.
Business: jd.com Reach: jd.com SEO: fidelity.com Performance: fidelity.com Trust: Balanced
Business
jd.com
fidelity.com
0
jd.com
5
Value gap $2,149,410
Income gap $6
Reach
jd.com
fidelity.com
0
jd.com
3
Visitors gap 190
Pageviews gap 665
SEO
fidelity.com
fidelity.com
3
jd.com
2
Seo gap 7.0
Indexability gap 35
Performance
fidelity.com
fidelity.com
2
jd.com
0
Performance gap 100
Trust
Balanced
fidelity.com
0
jd.com
0

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

fidelity.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
3 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve indexability signals
Indexability 35 points behind
Why: :domain is behind on crawlability or indexability checks that directly affect discoverability.
Do next: Fix robots, sitemap, canonical and index directives so the homepage is cleanly discoverable.
Improve internal linking depth
Architecture 20 internal links behind
Why: The competing domain exposes more internal links from the homepage and looks easier to crawl.
Do next: Expose more important pages through clearer internal links and navigation paths.
jd.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
3 priorities
Lift technical performance
Performance 100 points behind
Why: Speed or rendering signals lag behind the competing domain and may hold back SEO quality.
Do next: Improve Core Web Vitals, image delivery and frontend payload before the next refresh.
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 7 points to match
Why: fidelity.com trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Metrica fidelity.com Vencedor jd.com
Valor estimado $220,786,886 jd.com $222,936,296
Visitantes diários 26,135 jd.com 26,325
Visualizações diárias 91,473 jd.com 92,138
Receita diária $823 jd.com $829
SEO Score 59 fidelity.com 52
Indexability 50 jd.com 85
OnPage 38 jd.com 41
Performance 100 fidelity.com 0
Trust 65 — 65
Coverage 76 jd.com 81
Confidence 79 jd.com 84
SEO Freshness (h) 291 fidelity.com 298
Country Switzerland — China
TLD com — com
Categoria — — —
Registrador CSC Corporate Domains, Inc. — MarkMonitor Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Internal Links 0 jd.com 20
Structured Data Blocks 0 — 0
PageSpeed Mobile — jd.com 25
PageSpeed Desktop — jd.com 24
PageRank 4 jd.com 4
Posição Tranco #968 jd.com #961
Nota SSL A — A
Status de segurança — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

fidelity.com
59/100
Pass 5 Warn 4 Fail 2 IDX 50 ONP 38 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
403 Fail
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Missing Warn
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
13 Warn
Description Length
0 Fail
HTML lang
Missing Warn
Viewport Meta
Missing Warn
Image Alt Coverage
0/0 Pass
jd.com
52/100
Pass 6 Warn 4 Fail 1 IDX 85 ONP 41 PERF 0 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Missing Warn
H1 Count
0 Fail
Title Length
17 Warn
Description Length
176 Pass
HTML lang
Missing Warn
Viewport Meta
Missing Warn
Image Alt Coverage
0/0 Pass

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Fix non-success HTTP status
CRITICAL Impact 22 Effort M Confidence 95% Focus area fidelity.com
A: 22 | B: 0
Why it matters: Search engines and users cannot reliably access the homepage when status is outside 2xx/3xx.
Recommended fix: Resolve server, routing, or redirect issues so the canonical homepage returns 200 (or a clean 301 chain).
Add meta description
HIGH Impact 10 Effort S Confidence 91% Focus area fidelity.com
A: 10 | B: 0
Why it matters: Missing descriptions reduce control of SERP snippets.
Recommended fix: Add a compelling meta description with clear value proposition and intent match.
Add one H1 heading
HIGH Impact 10 Effort S Confidence 90% Focus area jd.com
A: 0 | B: 10
Why it matters: Missing H1 weakens topical hierarchy for users and crawlers.
Recommended fix: Add exactly one descriptive H1 aligned with page intent.
Increase homepage content depth
MEDIUM Impact 6 Effort M Confidence 79% Focus area Both
A: 6 | B: 6
Why it matters: Thin content limits topical coverage and relevance context.
Recommended fix: Expand helpful unique copy that answers key user questions and links to deeper pages.

Proximos caminhos de descoberta

Use os sinais comparados para abrir hubs mais amplos e conjuntos de oportunidades SEO de alto valor.

Hubs meta →