7,595 domínios analisados · 20 categorias · Gratuito e instantâneo

Comparar dominios

Compare valor do site, trafego, SEO e sinais de hosting lado a lado.

Ver rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

cam.ac.uk 3 zimbra.com 1
cam.ac.uk leads in :lane
cam.ac.uk wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business: cam.ac.uk Reach: cam.ac.uk SEO: cam.ac.uk Performance: zimbra.com Trust: Balanced
Business
cam.ac.uk
cam.ac.uk
5
zimbra.com
0
Value gap $60,774,937
Income gap $336
Reach
cam.ac.uk
cam.ac.uk
3
zimbra.com
0
Visitors gap 10,660
Pageviews gap 37,310
SEO
cam.ac.uk
cam.ac.uk
4
zimbra.com
0
Seo gap 3.0
Onpage gap 17
Performance
zimbra.com
cam.ac.uk
0
zimbra.com
2
Performance gap 10
Trust
Balanced
cam.ac.uk
0
zimbra.com
0

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

cam.ac.uk
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
3 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Lift technical performance
Performance 10 points behind
Why: Speed or rendering signals lag behind the competing domain and may hold back SEO quality.
Do next: Improve Core Web Vitals, image delivery and frontend payload before the next refresh.
Improve internal linking depth
Architecture 52 internal links behind
Why: The competing domain exposes more internal links from the homepage and looks easier to crawl.
Do next: Expose more important pages through clearer internal links and navigation paths.
zimbra.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
2 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 17 points behind
Why: cam.ac.uk has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
Metrica cam.ac.uk Vencedor zimbra.com
Valor estimado $149,698,962 cam.ac.uk $88,924,026
Visitantes diários 17,245 cam.ac.uk 6,585
Visualizações diárias 60,358 cam.ac.uk 23,048
Receita diária $543 cam.ac.uk $207
SEO Score 88 cam.ac.uk 85
Indexability 100 — 100
OnPage 83 cam.ac.uk 66
Performance 90 zimbra.com 100
Trust 65 — 65
Coverage 100 cam.ac.uk 90
Confidence 100 cam.ac.uk 91
SEO Freshness (h) 18 cam.ac.uk 474
Country United States — United States
TLD uk — com
Categoria — — —
Registrador — — CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.
Internal Links 65 zimbra.com 117
Structured Data Blocks 1 — 1
PageSpeed Mobile 49 cam.ac.uk —
PageSpeed Desktop 85 cam.ac.uk —
PageRank 4 zimbra.com 4
Posição Tranco #1,467 cam.ac.uk #3,807
Nota SSL A — A
Status de segurança — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

cam.ac.uk
88/100
Pass 10 Warn 1 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 83 PERF 90 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
23 Pass
Description Length
132 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
6/22 Warn
zimbra.com
85/100
Pass 9 Warn 2 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 66 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
3 Warn
Title Length
65 Pass
Description Length
116 Pass
HTML lang
en-US Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
66/123 Warn

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve image ALT coverage
HIGH Impact 8 Effort M Confidence 84% Focus area zimbra.com
A: 5 | B: 8
Why it matters: Missing ALT text reduces accessibility and image search context.
Recommended fix: Add concise descriptive ALT text for informative images and empty ALT for decorative assets.
Increase homepage content depth
MEDIUM Impact 6 Effort M Confidence 79% Focus area Both
A: 6 | B: 6
Why it matters: Thin content limits topical coverage and relevance context.
Recommended fix: Expand helpful unique copy that answers key user questions and links to deeper pages.
Improve PageSpeed performance
MEDIUM Impact 6 Effort M Confidence 88% Focus area cam.ac.uk
A: 6 | B: 0
Why it matters: Low performance can reduce rankings, engagement, and conversion.
Recommended fix: Optimize render-blocking resources, image delivery, caching, and script payload size.
Improve First Contentful Paint
MEDIUM Impact 5 Effort M Confidence 82% Focus area cam.ac.uk
A: 5 | B: 0
Why it matters: Slow first paint delays visible feedback for users.
Recommended fix: Reduce critical CSS/JS, inline essential styles, and improve server/cache latency.

Proximos caminhos de descoberta

Use os sinais comparados para abrir hubs mais amplos e conjuntos de oportunidades SEO de alto valor.

Hubs meta →