7,596 domínios analisados · 20 categorias · Gratuito e instantâneo

Comparar dominios

Compare valor do site, trafego, SEO e sinais de hosting lado a lado.

Ver rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

apollo.io 1 ucm.es 3
ucm.es leads in :lane
ucm.es wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business: ucm.es Reach: ucm.es SEO: apollo.io Performance: ucm.es Trust: Balanced
Business
ucm.es
apollo.io
0
ucm.es
5
Value gap $16,259
Income gap $9
Reach
ucm.es
apollo.io
0
ucm.es
3
Visitors gap 290
Pageviews gap 1,015
SEO
apollo.io
apollo.io
5
ucm.es
0
Seo gap 4.0
Indexability gap 35
Performance
ucm.es
apollo.io
0
ucm.es
2
Performance gap 65
Trust
Balanced
apollo.io
0
ucm.es
0

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

apollo.io
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
3 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Lift technical performance
Performance 65 points behind
Why: Speed or rendering signals lag behind the competing domain and may hold back SEO quality.
Do next: Improve Core Web Vitals, image delivery and frontend payload before the next refresh.
Improve internal linking depth
Architecture 146 internal links behind
Why: The competing domain exposes more internal links from the homepage and looks easier to crawl.
Do next: Expose more important pages through clearer internal links and navigation paths.
ucm.es
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
4 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve indexability signals
Indexability 35 points behind
Why: :domain is behind on crawlability or indexability checks that directly affect discoverability.
Do next: Fix robots, sitemap, canonical and index directives so the homepage is cleanly discoverable.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 4 points to match
Why: apollo.io trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 17 points behind
Why: apollo.io has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
Metrica apollo.io Vencedor ucm.es
Valor estimado $51,876,703 ucm.es $51,892,962
Visitantes diários 3,271 ucm.es 3,561
Visualizações diárias 11,449 ucm.es 12,464
Receita diária $103 ucm.es $112
SEO Score 79 apollo.io 75
Indexability 100 apollo.io 65
OnPage 91 apollo.io 74
Performance 35 ucm.es 100
Trust 65 — 65
Coverage 100 apollo.io 86
Confidence 100 apollo.io 88
SEO Freshness (h) 25 apollo.io 308
Country Canada — Spain
TLD io — es
Categoria — — —
Registrador — — —
Internal Links 192 ucm.es 338
Structured Data Blocks 2 apollo.io 0
PageSpeed Mobile 34 apollo.io —
PageSpeed Desktop 56 apollo.io —
PageRank 4 apollo.io 4
Posição Tranco #7,558 ucm.es #6,977
Nota SSL A — A
Status de segurança — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

apollo.io
79/100
Pass 10 Warn 1 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 91 PERF 35 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
49 Pass
Description Length
141 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
12/35 Warn
ucm.es
75/100
Pass 7 Warn 4 Fail 0 IDX 65 ONP 74 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Missing Warn
sitemap.xml
Missing Warn
Canonical URL
Missing Warn
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
33 Pass
Description Length
153 Pass
HTML lang
es Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
18/61 Warn

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve PageSpeed performance
HIGH Impact 12 Effort L Confidence 88% Focus area apollo.io
A: 12 | B: 0
Why it matters: Low performance can reduce rankings, engagement, and conversion.
Recommended fix: Optimize render-blocking resources, image delivery, caching, and script payload size.
Add robots.txt
MEDIUM Impact 7 Effort S Confidence 85% Focus area ucm.es
A: 0 | B: 7
Why it matters: robots.txt helps crawlers understand allowed paths and improves crawl clarity.
Recommended fix: Create /robots.txt with allowed sections and a sitemap reference.
Publish XML sitemap
MEDIUM Impact 7 Effort S Confidence 84% Focus area ucm.es
A: 0 | B: 7
Why it matters: A sitemap improves URL discovery and recrawl efficiency.
Recommended fix: Generate /sitemap.xml, include canonical URLs, and keep it auto-updated.
Add canonical URL
MEDIUM Impact 6 Effort S Confidence 85% Focus area ucm.es
A: 0 | B: 6
Why it matters: Canonical tags prevent duplicate URL confusion and consolidate ranking signals.
Recommended fix: Set a self-referencing canonical on indexable pages and avoid cross-canonical mistakes.