ドメインを比較
サイト価値、トラフィック、SEO、ホスティング指標を並べて比較します。
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.
Executive Summary
A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.
rit.edu 2
tenjin.com 2
:lane is currently balanced
Both domains perform similarly across the weighted signals in this lane.
Business:
rit.edu
Reach:
rit.edu
SEO:
tenjin.com
Performance:
Balanced
Trust:
tenjin.com
Business
rit.edu
rit.edu
5
tenjin.com
0
Value gap $4,044
Income gap $10
Reach
rit.edu
rit.edu
3
tenjin.com
0
Visitors gap 326
Pageviews gap 1,141
SEO
tenjin.com
rit.edu
1
tenjin.com
3
Seo gap 3.0
Onpage gap 4.0
Performance
Balanced
rit.edu
0
tenjin.com
0
Trust
tenjin.com
rit.edu
0
tenjin.com
2
Trust gap 29
Next Best Moves
The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.
rit.edu
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust
Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Raise trust and safety confidence
Trust
29 points behind
Why: tenjin.com looks weaker on trust-oriented checks such as HTTPS, SSL quality or safety signals.
Do next: Strengthen HTTPS, certificate quality and surface clearer trust signals across the site.
tenjin.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust
Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve internal linking depth
Architecture
122 internal links behind
Why: The competing domain exposes more internal links from the homepage and looks easier to crawl.
Do next: Expose more important pages through clearer internal links and navigation paths.
SEO Audit Snapshot
A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.
89/100
Pass 11
Warn 0
Fail 0
IDX 100
ONP 95
PERF 100
TRUST 36
HTTP Status
200
Pass
Indexability
Indexable
Pass
robots.txt
Found
Pass
sitemap.xml
Found
Pass
Canonical URL
Present
Pass
H1 Count
1
Pass
Title Length
39
Pass
Description Length
153
Pass
HTML lang
en
Pass
Viewport Meta
Present
Pass
Image Alt Coverage
0/84
Pass
92/100
Pass 10
Warn 1
Fail 0
IDX 100
ONP 91
PERF 100
TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200
Pass
Indexability
Indexable
Pass
robots.txt
Found
Pass
sitemap.xml
Found
Pass
Canonical URL
Present
Pass
H1 Count
1
Pass
Title Length
35
Pass
Description Length
144
Pass
HTML lang
en-GB
Pass
Viewport Meta
Present
Pass
Image Alt Coverage
48/55
Warn
Top Levers Across Both Domains
Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.
Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL
Impact 24
Effort L
Confidence 94%
Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve image ALT coverage
HIGH
Impact 8
Effort M
Confidence 84%
Focus area tenjin.com
A: 0 | B: 8
Why it matters: Missing ALT text reduces accessibility and image search context.
Recommended fix: Add concise descriptive ALT text for informative images and empty ALT for decorative assets.
Complete Open Graph metadata
MEDIUM
Impact 4
Effort S
Confidence 81%
Focus area rit.edu
A: 4 | B: 0
Why it matters: Incomplete social tags reduce share-preview quality and consistency.
Recommended fix: Provide og:title, og:description, and og:image with stable canonical URLs.
次の発見ルート
比較したシグナルをもとに、より広いハブページや価値の高いSEO機会セットへ進んでください。