ドメインを比較
サイト価値、トラフィック、SEO、ホスティング指標を並べて比較します。
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.
Executive Summary
A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.
de.com 1
supabase.co 2
supabase.co leads in :lane
supabase.co wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business:
de.com
Reach:
supabase.co
SEO:
supabase.co
Performance:
Balanced
Trust:
Balanced
Business
de.com
de.com
3
supabase.co
2
Value gap $91,121
Income gap $101
Reach
supabase.co
de.com
0
supabase.co
3
Visitors gap 3,221
Pageviews gap 11,273
SEO
supabase.co
de.com
0
supabase.co
4
Seo gap 9.0
Onpage gap 30
Performance
Balanced
de.com
0
supabase.co
0
Trust
Balanced
de.com
0
supabase.co
0
Next Best Moves
The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.
de.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust
Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO
9 points to match
Why: supabase.co trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page
30 points behind
Why: supabase.co has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
Improve internal linking depth
Architecture
44 internal links behind
Why: The competing domain exposes more internal links from the homepage and looks easier to crawl.
Do next: Expose more important pages through clearer internal links and navigation paths.
supabase.co
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust
Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
SEO Audit Snapshot
A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.
83/100
Pass 8
Warn 2
Fail 1
IDX 100
ONP 61
PERF 100
TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200
Pass
Indexability
Indexable
Pass
robots.txt
Found
Pass
sitemap.xml
Found
Pass
Canonical URL
Present
Pass
H1 Count
0
Fail
Title Length
51
Pass
Description Length
183
Warn
HTML lang
en
Pass
Viewport Meta
Present
Pass
Image Alt Coverage
4/27
Warn
92/100
Pass 10
Warn 1
Fail 0
IDX 100
ONP 91
PERF 100
TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200
Pass
Indexability
Indexable
Pass
robots.txt
Found
Pass
sitemap.xml
Found
Pass
Canonical URL
Present
Pass
H1 Count
1
Pass
Title Length
44
Pass
Description Length
159
Pass
HTML lang
en
Pass
Viewport Meta
Present
Pass
Image Alt Coverage
6/57
Warn
Top Levers Across Both Domains
Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.
Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL
Impact 24
Effort L
Confidence 94%
Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Add one H1 heading
HIGH
Impact 10
Effort S
Confidence 90%
Focus area de.com
A: 10 | B: 0
Why it matters: Missing H1 weakens topical hierarchy for users and crawlers.
Recommended fix: Add exactly one descriptive H1 aligned with page intent.
Improve image ALT coverage
MEDIUM
Impact 5
Effort M
Confidence 84%
Focus area Both
A: 5 | B: 5
Why it matters: Missing ALT text reduces accessibility and image search context.
Recommended fix: Add concise descriptive ALT text for informative images and empty ALT for decorative assets.
Add structured data
MEDIUM
Impact 5
Effort M
Confidence 80%
Focus area de.com
A: 5 | B: 0
Why it matters: Structured data improves entity clarity and rich-result eligibility.
Recommended fix: Implement relevant JSON-LD schema types (Organization, WebSite, Product, Article, etc.).
Optimize description length
MEDIUM
Impact 4
Effort S
Confidence 86%
Focus area de.com
A: 4 | B: 0
Why it matters: Length outside common snippet ranges can reduce readability in SERP.
Recommended fix: Target about 70-180 characters and include clear user benefit.
次の発見ルート
比較したシグナルをもとに、より広いハブページや価値の高いSEO機会セットへ進んでください。
関連ハブ