7,497 dominios analizados · 20 categorías · Gratis e instantáneo

Comparar dominios

Compara valor web, trafico, SEO y hosting lado a lado.

Ver rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

rutube.ru 3 yale.edu 1
rutube.ru leads in :lane
rutube.ru wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business: yale.edu Reach: rutube.ru SEO: rutube.ru Performance: Balanced Trust: rutube.ru
Business
yale.edu
rutube.ru
2
yale.edu
3
Value gap $314,180
Income gap $33
Reach
rutube.ru
rutube.ru
3
yale.edu
0
Visitors gap 1,045
Pageviews gap 3,658
SEO
rutube.ru
rutube.ru
4
yale.edu
0
Seo gap 7.0
Onpage gap 21
Performance
Balanced
rutube.ru
0
yale.edu
0
Trust
rutube.ru
rutube.ru
1
yale.edu
0
Ssl gap 1 SSL

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

rutube.ru
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
1 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
yale.edu
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
4 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 7 points to match
Why: rutube.ru trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 21 points behind
Why: rutube.ru has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
Improve internal linking depth
Architecture 381 internal links behind
Why: The competing domain exposes more internal links from the homepage and looks easier to crawl.
Do next: Expose more important pages through clearer internal links and navigation paths.
Metrica rutube.ru Ganador yale.edu
Valor estimado $190,034,632 yale.edu $190,348,812
Visitantes diarios 23,295 rutube.ru 22,250
Páginas vistas diarias 81,533 rutube.ru 77,875
Ingresos diarios $734 rutube.ru $701
SEO Score 86 rutube.ru 79
Indexability 100 — 100
OnPage 70 rutube.ru 49
Rendimiento 100 — 100
Trust 65 — 65
Coverage 90 — 90
Confidence 91 — 91
SEO Freshness (h) 253 yale.edu 132
Country Russia — Canada
TLD ru — edu
Categoría — — —
Registrador — — —
Internal Links 482 rutube.ru 101
Structured Data Blocks 1 rutube.ru 0
PageSpeed Mobile — — —
PageSpeed Desktop — — —
PageRank 6 rutube.ru 5
Posición Tranco #1,087 rutube.ru #1,123
Calificación SSL A — B
Estado de seguridad — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

rutube.ru
86/100
Pass 9 Warn 1 Fail 1 IDX 100 ONP 70 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
0 Fail
Title Length
42 Pass
Description Length
179 Pass
HTML lang
ru Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
3/188 Warn
yale.edu
79/100
Pass 7 Warn 4 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 49 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
2 Warn
Title Length
15 Warn
Description Length
195 Warn
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
9/15 Warn

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Add one H1 heading
HIGH Impact 10 Effort S Confidence 90% Focus area rutube.ru
A: 10 | B: 0
Why it matters: Missing H1 weakens topical hierarchy for users and crawlers.
Recommended fix: Add exactly one descriptive H1 aligned with page intent.
Improve image ALT coverage
HIGH Impact 8 Effort M Confidence 84% Focus area yale.edu
A: 5 | B: 8
Why it matters: Missing ALT text reduces accessibility and image search context.
Recommended fix: Add concise descriptive ALT text for informative images and empty ALT for decorative assets.
Reduce to a single primary H1
MEDIUM Impact 5 Effort S Confidence 82% Focus area yale.edu
A: 0 | B: 5
Why it matters: Multiple H1 tags can blur content hierarchy.
Recommended fix: Keep one main H1 and move secondary section titles to H2/H3.
Add structured data
MEDIUM Impact 5 Effort M Confidence 80% Focus area yale.edu
A: 0 | B: 5
Why it matters: Structured data improves entity clarity and rich-result eligibility.
Recommended fix: Implement relevant JSON-LD schema types (Organization, WebSite, Product, Article, etc.).