7,497 domains analyzed · 20 categories · Free & instant reports

Compare Domains

Compare website value, traffic, SEO and hosting signals side by side.

Browse Rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

rutube.ru 3 yale.edu 1
rutube.ru leads in :lane
rutube.ru wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business: yale.edu Reach: rutube.ru SEO: rutube.ru Performance: Balanced Trust: rutube.ru
Business
yale.edu
rutube.ru
2
yale.edu
3
Value gap $314,180
Income gap $33
Reach
rutube.ru
rutube.ru
3
yale.edu
0
Visitors gap 1,045
Pageviews gap 3,658
SEO
rutube.ru
rutube.ru
4
yale.edu
0
Seo gap 7.0
Onpage gap 21
Performance
Balanced
rutube.ru
0
yale.edu
0
Trust
rutube.ru
rutube.ru
1
yale.edu
0
Ssl gap 1 SSL

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

rutube.ru
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
1 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
yale.edu
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
4 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 7 points to match
Why: rutube.ru trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 21 points behind
Why: rutube.ru has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
Improve internal linking depth
Architecture 381 internal links behind
Why: The competing domain exposes more internal links from the homepage and looks easier to crawl.
Do next: Expose more important pages through clearer internal links and navigation paths.
Metric rutube.ru Winner yale.edu
Estimated Value $190,034,632 yale.edu $190,348,812
Daily Visitors 23,295 rutube.ru 22,250
Daily Pageviews 81,533 rutube.ru 77,875
Daily Income $734 rutube.ru $701
SEO Score 86 rutube.ru 79
Indexability 100 — 100
OnPage 70 rutube.ru 49
Performance 100 — 100
Trust 65 — 65
Coverage 90 — 90
Confidence 91 — 91
SEO Freshness (h) 252 yale.edu 131
Country Russia — Canada
TLD ru — edu
Category — — —
Registrar — — —
Internal Links 482 rutube.ru 101
Structured Data Blocks 1 rutube.ru 0
PageSpeed Mobile — — —
PageSpeed Desktop — — —
PageRank 6 rutube.ru 5
Tranco Rank #1,087 rutube.ru #1,123
SSL Grade A — B
Safety Status — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

rutube.ru
86/100
Pass 9 Warn 1 Fail 1 IDX 100 ONP 70 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
0 Fail
Title Length
42 Pass
Description Length
179 Pass
HTML lang
ru Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
3/188 Warn
yale.edu
79/100
Pass 7 Warn 4 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 49 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
2 Warn
Title Length
15 Warn
Description Length
195 Warn
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
9/15 Warn

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Add one H1 heading
HIGH Impact 10 Effort S Confidence 90% Focus area rutube.ru
A: 10 | B: 0
Why it matters: Missing H1 weakens topical hierarchy for users and crawlers.
Recommended fix: Add exactly one descriptive H1 aligned with page intent.
Improve image ALT coverage
HIGH Impact 8 Effort M Confidence 84% Focus area yale.edu
A: 5 | B: 8
Why it matters: Missing ALT text reduces accessibility and image search context.
Recommended fix: Add concise descriptive ALT text for informative images and empty ALT for decorative assets.
Reduce to a single primary H1
MEDIUM Impact 5 Effort S Confidence 82% Focus area yale.edu
A: 0 | B: 5
Why it matters: Multiple H1 tags can blur content hierarchy.
Recommended fix: Keep one main H1 and move secondary section titles to H2/H3.
Add structured data
MEDIUM Impact 5 Effort M Confidence 80% Focus area yale.edu
A: 0 | B: 5
Why it matters: Structured data improves entity clarity and rich-result eligibility.
Recommended fix: Implement relevant JSON-LD schema types (Organization, WebSite, Product, Article, etc.).