7,596 domains analyzed · 20 categories · Free & instant reports
websitevalue.me

Compare Domains

Compare website value, traffic, SEO and hosting signals side by side.

Browse Rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

outbrain.com 2 intercom.io 2
:lane is currently balanced
Both domains perform similarly across the weighted signals in this lane.
Business: intercom.io Reach: intercom.io SEO: outbrain.com Performance: outbrain.com Trust: Balanced
Business
intercom.io
outbrain.com
0
intercom.io
5
Value gap $542,879
Income gap $56
Reach
intercom.io
outbrain.com
0
intercom.io
3
Visitors gap 1,762
Pageviews gap 6,167
SEO
outbrain.com
outbrain.com
3
intercom.io
1
Seo gap 8.0
Onpage gap 17
Performance
outbrain.com
outbrain.com
3
intercom.io
0
Performance gap 65
Mobile speed gap 38
Trust
Balanced
outbrain.com
0
intercom.io
0

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

outbrain.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
3 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 17 points behind
Why: intercom.io has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
Expand structured data coverage
Structured data 1 schema blocks behind
Why: intercom.io uses more structured data blocks, which can improve machine understanding and rich result coverage.
Do next: Add clean schema markup for the brand, organization and key page entities.
intercom.io
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
3 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Lift technical performance
Performance 65 points behind
Why: Speed or rendering signals lag behind the competing domain and may hold back SEO quality.
Do next: Improve Core Web Vitals, image delivery and frontend payload before the next refresh.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 8 points to match
Why: outbrain.com trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Metric outbrain.com Winner intercom.io
Estimated Value $267,351,596 intercom.io $267,894,475
Daily Visitors 36,453 intercom.io 38,215
Daily Pageviews 127,586 intercom.io 133,753
Daily Income $1,148 intercom.io $1,204
SEO Score 85 outbrain.com 77
Indexability 100 — 100
OnPage 66 intercom.io 83
Performance 100 outbrain.com 35
Trust 65 — 65
Coverage 100 outbrain.com 95
Confidence 100 outbrain.com 96
SEO Freshness (h) 276 intercom.io 9
Country Canada — Germany
TLD com — io
Category — — —
Registrar MarkMonitor Inc. — —
Internal Links 43 outbrain.com 41
Structured Data Blocks 0 intercom.io 1
PageSpeed Mobile 63 outbrain.com 25
PageSpeed Desktop 80 outbrain.com —
PageRank 4 intercom.io 4
Tranco Rank #694 intercom.io #662
SSL Grade A — A
Safety Status — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

outbrain.com
85/100
Pass 9 Warn 2 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 66 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
4 Warn
Title Length
45 Pass
Description Length
79 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
8/10 Warn
intercom.io
77/100
Pass 9 Warn 2 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 83 PERF 35 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
62 Pass
Description Length
192 Warn
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
7/60 Warn

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve PageSpeed performance
HIGH Impact 12 Effort L Confidence 88% Focus area intercom.io
A: 6 | B: 12
Why it matters: Low performance can reduce rankings, engagement, and conversion.
Recommended fix: Optimize render-blocking resources, image delivery, caching, and script payload size.
Improve image ALT coverage
HIGH Impact 8 Effort M Confidence 84% Focus area outbrain.com
A: 8 | B: 5
Why it matters: Missing ALT text reduces accessibility and image search context.
Recommended fix: Add concise descriptive ALT text for informative images and empty ALT for decorative assets.
Improve First Contentful Paint
MEDIUM Impact 5 Effort M Confidence 82% Focus area intercom.io
A: 0 | B: 5
Why it matters: Slow first paint delays visible feedback for users.
Recommended fix: Reduce critical CSS/JS, inline essential styles, and improve server/cache latency.
Reduce to a single primary H1
MEDIUM Impact 5 Effort S Confidence 82% Focus area outbrain.com
A: 5 | B: 0
Why it matters: Multiple H1 tags can blur content hierarchy.
Recommended fix: Keep one main H1 and move secondary section titles to H2/H3.

Next discovery paths

Use the compared signals to branch into broader hub pages and high-value SEO opportunity sets.

Meta Hubs →

Recently Compared

Popular Comparisons