7,596 доменов проанализировано · 20 категорий · Бесплатно и мгновенно

Сравнить домены

Сравнивайте ценность сайта, трафик, SEO и хостинг бок о бок.

Смотреть рейтинги
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

ibm.com 2 wikimedia.org 2
:lane is currently balanced
Both domains perform similarly across the weighted signals in this lane.
Business: ibm.com Reach: wikimedia.org SEO: ibm.com Performance: wikimedia.org Trust: Balanced
Business
ibm.com
ibm.com
3
wikimedia.org
2
Value gap $5,456,602
Income gap $309
Reach
wikimedia.org
ibm.com
0
wikimedia.org
3
Visitors gap 9,816
Pageviews gap 34,356
SEO
ibm.com
ibm.com
5
wikimedia.org
0
Seo gap 6.0
Indexability gap 35
Performance
wikimedia.org
ibm.com
0
wikimedia.org
2
Performance gap 100
Trust
Balanced
ibm.com
0
wikimedia.org
0

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

ibm.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
2 priorities
Lift technical performance
Performance 100 points behind
Why: Speed or rendering signals lag behind the competing domain and may hold back SEO quality.
Do next: Improve Core Web Vitals, image delivery and frontend payload before the next refresh.
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
wikimedia.org
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
4 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 44 points behind
Why: ibm.com has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
Improve indexability signals
Indexability 35 points behind
Why: :domain is behind on crawlability or indexability checks that directly affect discoverability.
Do next: Fix robots, sitemap, canonical and index directives so the homepage is cleanly discoverable.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 6 points to match
Why: ibm.com trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Метрика ibm.com Победитель wikimedia.org
Расчётная стоимость $438,495,651 ibm.com $433,039,049
Ежедневные посетители 89,393 wikimedia.org 99,209
Ежедневные просмотры 312,876 wikimedia.org 347,232
Ежедневный доход $2,816 wikimedia.org $3,125
SEO Score 72 ibm.com 66
Indexability 100 ibm.com 65
OnPage 90 ibm.com 46
Производительность 0 wikimedia.org 100
Trust 65 — 65
Coverage 90 ibm.com 86
Confidence 91 ibm.com 88
SEO Freshness (h) 181 ibm.com 285
Country Germany — Netherlands
TLD com — org
Категория — — —
Регистратор CSC Corporate Domains, Inc. — MarkMonitor Inc.
Internal Links 30 ibm.com 6
Structured Data Blocks 1 ibm.com 0
PageSpeed Mobile — wikimedia.org 99
PageSpeed Desktop — wikimedia.org 100
PageRank 5 ibm.com 5
Tranco рейтинг #283 wikimedia.org #255
SSL оценка A — A
Статус безопасности — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

ibm.com
72/100
Pass 10 Warn 1 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 90 PERF 0 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
3 Warn
Description Length
157 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
0/14 Pass
wikimedia.org
66/100
Pass 5 Warn 5 Fail 1 IDX 65 ONP 46 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Missing Warn
sitemap.xml
Missing Warn
Canonical URL
Missing Warn
H1 Count
0 Fail
Title Length
9 Warn
Description Length
135 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
1/16 Warn

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Add one H1 heading
HIGH Impact 10 Effort S Confidence 90% Focus area wikimedia.org
A: 0 | B: 10
Why it matters: Missing H1 weakens topical hierarchy for users and crawlers.
Recommended fix: Add exactly one descriptive H1 aligned with page intent.
Add robots.txt
MEDIUM Impact 7 Effort S Confidence 85% Focus area wikimedia.org
A: 0 | B: 7
Why it matters: robots.txt helps crawlers understand allowed paths and improves crawl clarity.
Recommended fix: Create /robots.txt with allowed sections and a sitemap reference.
Publish XML sitemap
MEDIUM Impact 7 Effort S Confidence 84% Focus area wikimedia.org
A: 0 | B: 7
Why it matters: A sitemap improves URL discovery and recrawl efficiency.
Recommended fix: Generate /sitemap.xml, include canonical URLs, and keep it auto-updated.
Increase homepage content depth
MEDIUM Impact 6 Effort M Confidence 79% Focus area wikimedia.org
A: 0 | B: 6
Why it matters: Thin content limits topical coverage and relevance context.
Recommended fix: Expand helpful unique copy that answers key user questions and links to deeper pages.

Следующие пути исследования

Используйте сравниваемые сигналы, чтобы перейти к более широким хабам и наборам ценных SEO-возможностей.

Мета-хабы →