7,596 доменов проанализировано · 20 категорий · Бесплатно и мгновенно

Сравнить домены

Сравнивайте ценность сайта, трафик, SEO и хостинг бок о бок.

Смотреть рейтинги
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

google.co.th 3 hbs.edu 2
google.co.th leads in :lane
google.co.th wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business: google.co.th Reach: google.co.th SEO: hbs.edu Performance: hbs.edu Trust: google.co.th
Business
google.co.th
google.co.th
5
hbs.edu
0
Value gap $36,112
Income gap $25
Reach
google.co.th
google.co.th
3
hbs.edu
0
Visitors gap 791
Pageviews gap 2,769
SEO
hbs.edu
google.co.th
0
hbs.edu
5
Seo gap 14
Indexability gap 15
Performance
hbs.edu
google.co.th
1
hbs.edu
3
Performance gap 10
Mobile speed gap 9.0
Trust
google.co.th
google.co.th
1
hbs.edu
0
Ssl gap 1 SSL

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

google.co.th
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
4 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 14 points to match
Why: hbs.edu trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 23 points behind
Why: hbs.edu has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
Improve indexability signals
Indexability 15 points behind
Why: :domain is behind on crawlability or indexability checks that directly affect discoverability.
Do next: Fix robots, sitemap, canonical and index directives so the homepage is cleanly discoverable.
hbs.edu
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
1 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Метрика google.co.th Победитель hbs.edu
Расчётная стоимость $84,564,874 google.co.th $84,528,762
Ежедневные посетители 7,491 google.co.th 6,700
Ежедневные просмотры 26,219 google.co.th 23,450
Ежедневный доход $236 google.co.th $211
SEO Score 71 hbs.edu 85
Indexability 85 hbs.edu 100
OnPage 44 hbs.edu 67
Производительность 90 hbs.edu 100
Trust 65 — 65
Coverage 90 hbs.edu 100
Confidence 93 hbs.edu 100
SEO Freshness (h) 272 hbs.edu 44
Country United States — United States
TLD th — edu
Категория — — —
Регистратор T.H.NIC Co., Ltd. — —
Internal Links 4 hbs.edu 162
Structured Data Blocks 0 — 0
PageSpeed Mobile 76 google.co.th 67
PageSpeed Desktop 76 hbs.edu 81
PageRank 4 google.co.th 3
Tranco рейтинг #3,542 google.co.th #3,872
SSL оценка A — B
Статус безопасности — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

google.co.th
71/100
Pass 6 Warn 4 Fail 1 IDX 85 ONP 44 PERF 90 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Missing Warn
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
6 Warn
Description Length
0 Fail
HTML lang
de-CH Pass
Viewport Meta
Missing Warn
Image Alt Coverage
7/8 Warn
hbs.edu
85/100
Pass 9 Warn 2 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 67 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
23 Pass
Description Length
23 Warn
HTML lang
en-us Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
1/3 Warn

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Add meta description
HIGH Impact 10 Effort S Confidence 91% Focus area google.co.th
A: 10 | B: 0
Why it matters: Missing descriptions reduce control of SERP snippets.
Recommended fix: Add a compelling meta description with clear value proposition and intent match.
Improve image ALT coverage
HIGH Impact 8 Effort M Confidence 84% Focus area google.co.th
A: 8 | B: 5
Why it matters: Missing ALT text reduces accessibility and image search context.
Recommended fix: Add concise descriptive ALT text for informative images and empty ALT for decorative assets.
Add canonical URL
MEDIUM Impact 6 Effort S Confidence 85% Focus area google.co.th
A: 6 | B: 0
Why it matters: Canonical tags prevent duplicate URL confusion and consolidate ranking signals.
Recommended fix: Set a self-referencing canonical on indexable pages and avoid cross-canonical mistakes.
Improve PageSpeed performance
MEDIUM Impact 6 Effort M Confidence 88% Focus area Both
A: 6 | B: 6
Why it matters: Low performance can reduce rankings, engagement, and conversion.
Recommended fix: Optimize render-blocking resources, image delivery, caching, and script payload size.

Следующие пути исследования

Используйте сравниваемые сигналы, чтобы перейти к более широким хабам и наборам ценных SEO-возможностей.

Мета-хабы →