7,496 доменов проанализировано · 20 категорий · Бесплатно и мгновенно

Сравнить домены

Сравнивайте ценность сайта, трафик, SEO и хостинг бок о бок.

Смотреть рейтинги
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

cnn.com 0 pages.dev 4
pages.dev leads in :lane
pages.dev wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business: pages.dev Reach: pages.dev SEO: pages.dev Performance: Balanced Trust: pages.dev
Business
pages.dev
cnn.com
2
pages.dev
3
Value gap $1,833,253
Income gap $5,104
Reach
pages.dev
cnn.com
1
pages.dev
2
Visitors gap 10,252
Pageviews gap 95,197
SEO
pages.dev
cnn.com
0
pages.dev
5
Seo gap 73
Indexability gap 100
Performance
Balanced
cnn.com
0
pages.dev
0
Trust
pages.dev
cnn.com
0
pages.dev
2
Trust gap 65

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

cnn.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
4 priorities
Improve indexability signals
Indexability 100 points behind
Why: :domain is behind on crawlability or indexability checks that directly affect discoverability.
Do next: Fix robots, sitemap, canonical and index directives so the homepage is cleanly discoverable.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 73 points to match
Why: pages.dev trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 93 points behind
Why: pages.dev has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
Raise trust and safety confidence
Trust 65 points behind
Why: pages.dev looks weaker on trust-oriented checks such as HTTPS, SSL quality or safety signals.
Do next: Strengthen HTTPS, certificate quality and surface clearer trust signals across the site.
pages.dev
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
1 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Метрика cnn.com Победитель pages.dev
Расчётная стоимость $532,845,188 pages.dev $534,678,441
Ежедневные посетители 131,079 pages.dev 141,331
Ежедневные просмотры 589,856 cnn.com 494,659
Ежедневный доход $9,556 cnn.com $4,452
SEO Score 0 pages.dev 73
Indexability 0 pages.dev 100
OnPage 0 pages.dev 93
Производительность 0 — 0
Trust 0 pages.dev 65
Coverage 0 pages.dev 90
Confidence 0 pages.dev 91
SEO Freshness (h) — cnn.com 171
Country Canada — Canada
TLD com — dev
Категория News & Media — —
Регистратор Nom-iq Ltd. dba COM LAUDE — CloudFlare, Inc.
Internal Links 0 pages.dev 88
Structured Data Blocks 0 pages.dev 3
PageSpeed Mobile — pages.dev 68
PageSpeed Desktop — pages.dev 94
PageRank 5 cnn.com 4
Tranco рейтинг #193 pages.dev #179
SSL оценка A — A
Статус безопасности — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

cnn.com
0/100
Pass 2 Warn 5 Fail 4 IDX 0 ONP 0 PERF 0 TRUST 0
HTTP Status
- Fail
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Missing Warn
sitemap.xml
Missing Warn
Canonical URL
Missing Warn
H1 Count
0 Fail
Title Length
0 Fail
Description Length
0 Fail
HTML lang
Missing Warn
Viewport Meta
Missing Warn
Image Alt Coverage
0/0 Pass
pages.dev
73/100
Pass 11 Warn 0 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 93 PERF 0 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
49 Pass
Description Length
128 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
0/2 Pass

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area pages.dev
A: 0 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Increase homepage content depth
MEDIUM Impact 6 Effort M Confidence 79% Focus area pages.dev
A: 0 | B: 6
Why it matters: Thin content limits topical coverage and relevance context.
Recommended fix: Expand helpful unique copy that answers key user questions and links to deeper pages.
Reduce redirect chain length
MEDIUM Impact 4 Effort M Confidence 82% Focus area pages.dev
A: 0 | B: 4
Why it matters: Extra redirects increase latency and can waste crawl budget.
Recommended fix: Point internal links directly to final canonical URL and keep redirects to one hop.

Следующие пути исследования

Используйте сравниваемые сигналы, чтобы перейти к более широким хабам и наборам ценных SEO-возможностей.

Мета-хабы →