Confronta domini
Confronta valore del sito, traffico, SEO e hosting fianco a fianco.
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.
Executive Summary
A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.
fast.com 2
yahoo.co.jp 2
:lane is currently balanced
Both domains perform similarly across the weighted signals in this lane.
Business:
fast.com
Reach:
yahoo.co.jp
SEO:
fast.com
Performance:
Balanced
Trust:
yahoo.co.jp
Business
fast.com
fast.com
3
yahoo.co.jp
2
Value gap $196,071
Income gap $292
Reach
yahoo.co.jp
fast.com
0
yahoo.co.jp
3
Visitors gap 9,276
Pageviews gap 32,466
SEO
fast.com
fast.com
4
yahoo.co.jp
0
Seo gap 4.0
Onpage gap 12
Performance
Balanced
fast.com
0
yahoo.co.jp
0
Trust
yahoo.co.jp
fast.com
0
yahoo.co.jp
1
Ssl gap 1 SSL
Next Best Moves
The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.
fast.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust
Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve internal linking depth
Architecture
96 internal links behind
Why: The competing domain exposes more internal links from the homepage and looks easier to crawl.
Do next: Expose more important pages through clearer internal links and navigation paths.
yahoo.co.jp
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust
Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO
4 points to match
Why: fast.com trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page
12 points behind
Why: fast.com has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
SEO Audit Snapshot
A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.
84/100
Pass 8
Warn 2
Fail 1
IDX 100
ONP 63
PERF 100
TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200
Pass
Indexability
Indexable
Pass
robots.txt
Found
Pass
sitemap.xml
Found
Pass
Canonical URL
Present
Pass
H1 Count
0
Fail
Title Length
30
Pass
Description Length
116
Pass
HTML lang
Missing
Warn
Viewport Meta
Missing
Warn
Image Alt Coverage
0/0
Pass
80/100
Pass 8
Warn 3
Fail 0
IDX 100
ONP 51
PERF 100
TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200
Pass
Indexability
Indexable
Pass
robots.txt
Found
Pass
sitemap.xml
Found
Pass
Canonical URL
Present
Pass
H1 Count
30
Warn
Title Length
12
Warn
Description Length
73
Pass
HTML lang
ja
Pass
Viewport Meta
Present
Pass
Image Alt Coverage
3/5
Warn
Top Levers Across Both Domains
Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.
Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL
Impact 24
Effort L
Confidence 94%
Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Add one H1 heading
HIGH
Impact 10
Effort S
Confidence 90%
Focus area fast.com
A: 10 | B: 0
Why it matters: Missing H1 weakens topical hierarchy for users and crawlers.
Recommended fix: Add exactly one descriptive H1 aligned with page intent.
Improve image ALT coverage
HIGH
Impact 8
Effort M
Confidence 84%
Focus area yahoo.co.jp
A: 0 | B: 8
Why it matters: Missing ALT text reduces accessibility and image search context.
Recommended fix: Add concise descriptive ALT text for informative images and empty ALT for decorative assets.
Increase homepage content depth
MEDIUM
Impact 6
Effort M
Confidence 79%
Focus area yahoo.co.jp
A: 0 | B: 6
Why it matters: Thin content limits topical coverage and relevance context.
Recommended fix: Expand helpful unique copy that answers key user questions and links to deeper pages.
Improve PageSpeed performance
MEDIUM
Impact 6
Effort M
Confidence 88%
Focus area yahoo.co.jp
A: 0 | B: 6
Why it matters: Low performance can reduce rankings, engagement, and conversion.
Recommended fix: Optimize render-blocking resources, image delivery, caching, and script payload size.
Prossimi percorsi di scoperta
Usa i segnali confrontati per aprire hub piu ampi e gruppi di opportunita SEO ad alto valore.
Hub correlati
Confrontati di recente
Aggiornato 16 seconds ago
Aggiornato 19 seconds ago
Aggiornato 19 seconds ago
Aggiornato 27 seconds ago
Aggiornato 1 minute ago
Aggiornato 2 minutes ago
Aggiornato 7 minutes ago
Aggiornato 10 minutes ago