7,596 domains analyzed · 20 categories · Free & instant reports

Compare Domains

Compare website value, traffic, SEO and hosting signals side by side.

Browse Rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

run.app 3 shop.app 1
run.app leads in :lane
run.app wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business: run.app Reach: run.app SEO: shop.app Performance: run.app Trust: Balanced
Business
run.app
run.app
5
shop.app
0
Value gap $532,416
Income gap $68
Reach
run.app
run.app
3
shop.app
0
Visitors gap 2,149
Pageviews gap 7,521
SEO
shop.app
run.app
0
shop.app
5
Seo gap 11
Indexability gap 20
Performance
run.app
run.app
1
shop.app
0
Desktop speed gap 36
Trust
Balanced
run.app
0
shop.app
0

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

run.app
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
4 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 11 points to match
Why: shop.app trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Improve indexability signals
Indexability 20 points behind
Why: :domain is behind on crawlability or indexability checks that directly affect discoverability.
Do next: Fix robots, sitemap, canonical and index directives so the homepage is cleanly discoverable.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 14 points behind
Why: shop.app has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
shop.app
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
1 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Metric run.app Winner shop.app
Estimated Value $305,540,812 run.app $305,008,396
Daily Visitors 49,702 run.app 47,553
Daily Pageviews 173,957 run.app 166,436
Daily Income $1,566 run.app $1,498
SEO Score 55 shop.app 66
Indexability 30 shop.app 50
OnPage 48 shop.app 62
Performance 100 — 100
Trust 65 — 65
Coverage 90 run.app 86
Confidence 91 run.app 88
SEO Freshness (h) 261 run.app 416
Country United States — Canada
TLD app — app
Category — — —
Registrar MarkMonitor Inc. — MarkMonitor Inc.
Internal Links 0 — 0
Structured Data Blocks 0 — 0
PageSpeed Mobile 100 run.app —
PageSpeed Desktop 100 run.app 64
PageRank 2 shop.app 5
Tranco Rank #509 run.app #532
SSL Grade A — A
Safety Status — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

run.app
55/100
Pass 5 Warn 3 Fail 3 IDX 30 ONP 48 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
404 Fail
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Missing Warn
sitemap.xml
Missing Warn
Canonical URL
Missing Warn
H1 Count
0 Fail
Title Length
24 Pass
Description Length
0 Fail
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
0/0 Pass
shop.app
66/100
Pass 8 Warn 1 Fail 2 IDX 50 ONP 62 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
403 Fail
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Missing Warn
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
28 Pass
Description Length
0 Fail
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
0/0 Pass

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Fix non-success HTTP status
CRITICAL Impact 22 Effort M Confidence 95% Focus area Both
A: 22 | B: 22
Why it matters: Search engines and users cannot reliably access the homepage when status is outside 2xx/3xx.
Recommended fix: Resolve server, routing, or redirect issues so the canonical homepage returns 200 (or a clean 301 chain).
Add meta description
HIGH Impact 10 Effort S Confidence 91% Focus area Both
A: 10 | B: 10
Why it matters: Missing descriptions reduce control of SERP snippets.
Recommended fix: Add a compelling meta description with clear value proposition and intent match.
Add one H1 heading
HIGH Impact 10 Effort S Confidence 90% Focus area run.app
A: 10 | B: 0
Why it matters: Missing H1 weakens topical hierarchy for users and crawlers.
Recommended fix: Add exactly one descriptive H1 aligned with page intent.
Add robots.txt
MEDIUM Impact 7 Effort S Confidence 85% Focus area run.app
A: 7 | B: 0
Why it matters: robots.txt helps crawlers understand allowed paths and improves crawl clarity.
Recommended fix: Create /robots.txt with allowed sections and a sitemap reference.