7,596 domains analyzed · 20 categories · Free & instant reports

Compare Domains

Compare website value, traffic, SEO and hosting signals side by side.

Browse Rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

run.app 2 google.cn 2
:lane is currently balanced
Both domains perform similarly across the weighted signals in this lane.
Business: run.app Reach: google.cn SEO: google.cn Performance: Balanced Trust: run.app
Business
run.app
run.app
3
google.cn
2
Value gap $665,041
Income gap $309
Reach
google.cn
run.app
0
google.cn
3
Visitors gap 9,823
Pageviews gap 34,381
SEO
google.cn
run.app
1
google.cn
4
Seo gap 5.0
Indexability gap 25
Performance
Balanced
run.app
0
google.cn
0
Trust
run.app
run.app
2
google.cn
0
Trust gap 20

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

run.app
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
3 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 5 points to match
Why: google.cn trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Improve indexability signals
Indexability 25 points behind
Why: :domain is behind on crawlability or indexability checks that directly affect discoverability.
Do next: Fix robots, sitemap, canonical and index directives so the homepage is cleanly discoverable.
google.cn
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
2 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Raise trust and safety confidence
Trust 20 points behind
Why: run.app looks weaker on trust-oriented checks such as HTTPS, SSL quality or safety signals.
Do next: Strengthen HTTPS, certificate quality and surface clearer trust signals across the site.
Metric run.app Winner google.cn
Estimated Value $305,540,812 run.app $304,875,771
Daily Visitors 49,702 google.cn 59,525
Daily Pageviews 173,957 google.cn 208,338
Daily Income $1,566 google.cn $1,875
SEO Score 55 google.cn 60
Indexability 30 google.cn 55
OnPage 48 run.app 46
Performance 100 — 100
Trust 65 run.app 45
Coverage 90 run.app 81
Confidence 91 run.app 83
SEO Freshness (h) 268 google.cn 10
Country United States — United States
TLD app — cn
Category — — —
Registrar MarkMonitor Inc. — —
Internal Links 0 — 0
Structured Data Blocks 0 — 0
PageSpeed Mobile 100 run.app —
PageSpeed Desktop 100 run.app —
PageRank 2 google.cn 4
Tranco Rank #509 google.cn #425
SSL Grade A — A
Safety Status — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

run.app
55/100
Pass 5 Warn 3 Fail 3 IDX 30 ONP 48 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
404 Fail
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Missing Warn
sitemap.xml
Missing Warn
Canonical URL
Missing Warn
H1 Count
0 Fail
Title Length
24 Pass
Description Length
0 Fail
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
0/0 Pass
google.cn
60/100
Pass 6 Warn 4 Fail 1 IDX 55 ONP 46 PERF 100 TRUST 45
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Missing Warn
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Missing Warn
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
6 Warn
Description Length
0 Fail
HTML lang
zh Pass
Viewport Meta
Missing Warn
Image Alt Coverage
0/1 Pass

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Fix non-success HTTP status
CRITICAL Impact 22 Effort M Confidence 95% Focus area run.app
A: 22 | B: 0
Why it matters: Search engines and users cannot reliably access the homepage when status is outside 2xx/3xx.
Recommended fix: Resolve server, routing, or redirect issues so the canonical homepage returns 200 (or a clean 301 chain).
Enforce HTTPS sitewide
HIGH Impact 14 Effort M Confidence 92% Focus area google.cn
A: 0 | B: 14
Why it matters: HTTPS is a trust and ranking baseline and protects user traffic.
Recommended fix: Install valid TLS, redirect HTTP to HTTPS with one hop, and update canonical/internal links.
Add meta description
HIGH Impact 10 Effort S Confidence 91% Focus area Both
A: 10 | B: 10
Why it matters: Missing descriptions reduce control of SERP snippets.
Recommended fix: Add a compelling meta description with clear value proposition and intent match.
Add one H1 heading
HIGH Impact 10 Effort S Confidence 90% Focus area run.app
A: 10 | B: 0
Why it matters: Missing H1 weakens topical hierarchy for users and crawlers.
Recommended fix: Add exactly one descriptive H1 aligned with page intent.