7,596 domains analyzed · 20 categories · Free & instant reports

Compare Domains

Compare website value, traffic, SEO and hosting signals side by side.

Browse Rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

procore.com 0 supabase.co 4
supabase.co leads in :lane
supabase.co wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business: supabase.co Reach: supabase.co SEO: supabase.co Performance: supabase.co Trust: Balanced
Business
supabase.co
procore.com
0
supabase.co
5
Value gap $68,964,940
Income gap $318
Reach
supabase.co
procore.com
0
supabase.co
3
Visitors gap 10,102
Pageviews gap 35,357
SEO
supabase.co
procore.com
0
supabase.co
3
Seo gap 20
Performance
supabase.co
procore.com
0
supabase.co
2
Performance gap 100
Trust
Balanced
procore.com
0
supabase.co
0

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

procore.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
4 priorities
Lift technical performance
Performance 100 points behind
Why: Speed or rendering signals lag behind the competing domain and may hold back SEO quality.
Do next: Improve Core Web Vitals, image delivery and frontend payload before the next refresh.
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 20 points to match
Why: supabase.co trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Expand structured data coverage
Structured data 3 schema blocks behind
Why: supabase.co uses more structured data blocks, which can improve machine understanding and rich result coverage.
Do next: Add clean schema markup for the brand, organization and key page entities.
supabase.co
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
1 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Metric procore.com Winner supabase.co
Estimated Value $45,796,963 supabase.co $114,761,903
Daily Visitors 2,694 supabase.co 12,796
Daily Pageviews 9,429 supabase.co 44,786
Daily Income $85 supabase.co $403
SEO Score 72 supabase.co 92
Indexability 100 — 100
OnPage 91 — 91
Performance 0 supabase.co 100
Trust 65 — 65
Coverage 90 — 90
Confidence 91 — 91
SEO Freshness (h) 215 supabase.co 3
Country United States — United States
TLD com — co
Category — — —
Registrar GoDaddy.com, LLC — —
Internal Links 68 supabase.co 75
Structured Data Blocks 1 supabase.co 4
PageSpeed Mobile — — —
PageSpeed Desktop — — —
PageRank 4 procore.com 3
Tranco Rank #8,791 supabase.co #1,088
SSL Grade A — A
Safety Status — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

procore.com
72/100
Pass 10 Warn 1 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 91 PERF 0 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
53 Pass
Description Length
150 Pass
HTML lang
en-gb Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
9/54 Warn
supabase.co
92/100
Pass 10 Warn 1 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 91 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
44 Pass
Description Length
159 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
6/57 Warn

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve image ALT coverage
MEDIUM Impact 5 Effort M Confidence 84% Focus area Both
A: 5 | B: 5
Why it matters: Missing ALT text reduces accessibility and image search context.
Recommended fix: Add concise descriptive ALT text for informative images and empty ALT for decorative assets.
Reduce redirect chain length
MEDIUM Impact 4 Effort M Confidence 82% Focus area procore.com
A: 4 | B: 0
Why it matters: Extra redirects increase latency and can waste crawl budget.
Recommended fix: Point internal links directly to final canonical URL and keep redirects to one hop.