Compare Domains
Compare website value, traffic, SEO and hosting signals side by side.
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.
Executive Summary
A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.
oreilly.com 1
scientificamerican.com 3
scientificamerican.com leads in :lane
scientificamerican.com wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business:
oreilly.com
Reach:
scientificamerican.com
SEO:
scientificamerican.com
Performance:
scientificamerican.com
Trust:
Balanced
Business
oreilly.com
oreilly.com
3
scientificamerican.com
2
Value gap $77,603
Income gap $14
Reach
scientificamerican.com
oreilly.com
0
scientificamerican.com
3
Visitors gap 446
Pageviews gap 1,561
SEO
scientificamerican.com
oreilly.com
1
scientificamerican.com
3
Seo gap 12
Onpage gap 3.0
Performance
scientificamerican.com
oreilly.com
0
scientificamerican.com
2
Performance gap 65
Trust
Balanced
oreilly.com
0
scientificamerican.com
0
Next Best Moves
The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.
oreilly.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust
Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Lift technical performance
Performance
65 points behind
Why: Speed or rendering signals lag behind the competing domain and may hold back SEO quality.
Do next: Improve Core Web Vitals, image delivery and frontend payload before the next refresh.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO
12 points to match
Why: scientificamerican.com trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
scientificamerican.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust
Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve internal linking depth
Architecture
176 internal links behind
Why: The competing domain exposes more internal links from the homepage and looks easier to crawl.
Do next: Expose more important pages through clearer internal links and navigation paths.
Expand structured data coverage
Structured data
1 schema blocks behind
Why: oreilly.com uses more structured data blocks, which can improve machine understanding and rich result coverage.
Do next: Add clean schema markup for the brand, organization and key page entities.
SEO Audit Snapshot
A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.
78/100
Pass 11
Warn 0
Fail 0
IDX 100
ONP 88
PERF 35
TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200
Pass
Indexability
Indexable
Pass
robots.txt
Found
Pass
sitemap.xml
Found
Pass
Canonical URL
Present
Pass
H1 Count
1
Pass
Title Length
49
Pass
Description Length
138
Pass
HTML lang
en
Pass
Viewport Meta
Present
Pass
Image Alt Coverage
0/17
Pass
90/100
Pass 9
Warn 2
Fail 0
IDX 100
ONP 85
PERF 100
TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200
Pass
Indexability
Indexable
Pass
robots.txt
Found
Pass
sitemap.xml
Found
Pass
Canonical URL
Present
Pass
H1 Count
1
Pass
Title Length
19
Warn
Description Length
183
Warn
HTML lang
en
Pass
Viewport Meta
Present
Pass
Image Alt Coverage
0/42
Pass
Top Levers Across Both Domains
Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.
Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL
Impact 24
Effort L
Confidence 94%
Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve PageSpeed performance
HIGH
Impact 12
Effort L
Confidence 88%
Focus area oreilly.com
A: 12 | B: 0
Why it matters: Low performance can reduce rankings, engagement, and conversion.
Recommended fix: Optimize render-blocking resources, image delivery, caching, and script payload size.
Increase homepage content depth
MEDIUM
Impact 6
Effort M
Confidence 79%
Focus area oreilly.com
A: 6 | B: 0
Why it matters: Thin content limits topical coverage and relevance context.
Recommended fix: Expand helpful unique copy that answers key user questions and links to deeper pages.
Reduce layout shift (CLS)
MEDIUM
Impact 6
Effort M
Confidence 84%
Focus area oreilly.com
A: 6 | B: 0
Why it matters: Layout shifts hurt UX and Web Vitals stability.
Recommended fix: Reserve fixed space for media/ads and avoid late style or font shifts.
Optimize title length
MEDIUM
Impact 5
Effort S
Confidence 88%
Focus area scientificamerican.com
A: 0 | B: 5
Why it matters: Overly short or long titles can lower click-through and relevance quality.
Recommended fix: Target about 20-70 characters and front-load core keywords.
Next discovery paths
Use the compared signals to branch into broader hub pages and high-value SEO opportunity sets.
Related hubs
Related opportunities