7,596 domains analyzed · 20 categories · Free & instant reports

Compare Domains

Compare website value, traffic, SEO and hosting signals side by side.

Browse Rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

iol.pt 4 vu.nl 0
iol.pt leads in :lane
iol.pt wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business: iol.pt Reach: iol.pt SEO: iol.pt Performance: Balanced Trust: iol.pt
Business
iol.pt
iol.pt
5
vu.nl
0
Value gap $5,882
Income gap $7
Reach
iol.pt
iol.pt
3
vu.nl
0
Visitors gap 225
Pageviews gap 788
SEO
iol.pt
iol.pt
3
vu.nl
1
Seo gap 1.0
Onpage gap 11
Performance
Balanced
iol.pt
0
vu.nl
0
Trust
iol.pt
iol.pt
2
vu.nl
0
Trust gap 29

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

iol.pt
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
3 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 11 points behind
Why: vu.nl has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
Improve internal linking depth
Architecture 36 internal links behind
Why: The competing domain exposes more internal links from the homepage and looks easier to crawl.
Do next: Expose more important pages through clearer internal links and navigation paths.
vu.nl
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
3 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Raise trust and safety confidence
Trust 29 points behind
Why: iol.pt looks weaker on trust-oriented checks such as HTTPS, SSL quality or safety signals.
Do next: Strengthen HTTPS, certificate quality and surface clearer trust signals across the site.
Expand structured data coverage
Structured data 3 schema blocks behind
Why: iol.pt uses more structured data blocks, which can improve machine understanding and rich result coverage.
Do next: Add clean schema markup for the brand, organization and key page entities.
Metric iol.pt Winner vu.nl
Estimated Value $49,880,287 iol.pt $49,874,405
Daily Visitors 3,605 iol.pt 3,380
Daily Pageviews 12,618 iol.pt 11,830
Daily Income $114 iol.pt $106
SEO Score 86 iol.pt 85
Indexability 100 — 100
OnPage 70 vu.nl 81
Performance 100 — 100
Trust 65 iol.pt 36
Coverage 90 iol.pt 86
Confidence 91 iol.pt 87
SEO Freshness (h) 28 iol.pt 1,178
Country Portugal — Netherlands
TLD pt — nl
Category — — —
Registrar — — SURF B.V.
Internal Links 242 vu.nl 278
Structured Data Blocks 3 iol.pt 0
PageSpeed Mobile — — —
PageSpeed Desktop — — —
PageRank 3 vu.nl 5
Tranco Rank #12,573 vu.nl #7,275
SSL Grade A — A
Safety Status — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

iol.pt
86/100
Pass 9 Warn 1 Fail 1 IDX 100 ONP 70 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
0 Fail
Title Length
22 Pass
Description Length
107 Pass
HTML lang
pt Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
144/285 Warn
vu.nl
85/100
Pass 10 Warn 1 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 81 PERF 100 TRUST 36
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
28 Pass
Description Length
86 Pass
HTML lang
nl Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
5/5 Warn

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Add one H1 heading
HIGH Impact 10 Effort S Confidence 90% Focus area iol.pt
A: 10 | B: 0
Why it matters: Missing H1 weakens topical hierarchy for users and crawlers.
Recommended fix: Add exactly one descriptive H1 aligned with page intent.
Improve image ALT coverage
HIGH Impact 8 Effort M Confidence 84% Focus area Both
A: 8 | B: 8
Why it matters: Missing ALT text reduces accessibility and image search context.
Recommended fix: Add concise descriptive ALT text for informative images and empty ALT for decorative assets.
Increase homepage content depth
MEDIUM Impact 6 Effort M Confidence 79% Focus area iol.pt
A: 6 | B: 0
Why it matters: Thin content limits topical coverage and relevance context.
Recommended fix: Expand helpful unique copy that answers key user questions and links to deeper pages.
Add structured data
MEDIUM Impact 5 Effort M Confidence 80% Focus area vu.nl
A: 0 | B: 5
Why it matters: Structured data improves entity clarity and rich-result eligibility.
Recommended fix: Implement relevant JSON-LD schema types (Organization, WebSite, Product, Article, etc.).