7,594 domains analyzed · 20 categories · Free & instant reports
websitevalue.me

Compare Domains

Compare website value, traffic, SEO and hosting signals side by side.

Browse Rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

imagemagick.org 2 github.io 2
:lane is currently balanced
Both domains perform similarly across the weighted signals in this lane.
Business: github.io Reach: github.io SEO: imagemagick.org Performance: imagemagick.org Trust: Balanced
Business
github.io
imagemagick.org
0
github.io
5
Value gap $666,964,285
Income gap $20,821
Reach
github.io
imagemagick.org
0
github.io
3
Visitors gap 192,494
Pageviews gap 673,729
SEO
imagemagick.org
imagemagick.org
4
github.io
1
Seo gap 6.0
Indexability gap 10
Performance
imagemagick.org
imagemagick.org
4
github.io
0
Performance gap 10
Mobile speed gap 35
Trust
Balanced
imagemagick.org
0
github.io
0

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

imagemagick.org
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
2 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve indexability signals
Indexability 10 points behind
Why: :domain is behind on crawlability or indexability checks that directly affect discoverability.
Do next: Fix robots, sitemap, canonical and index directives so the homepage is cleanly discoverable.
github.io
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
4 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 6 points to match
Why: imagemagick.org trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 25 points behind
Why: imagemagick.org has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
Lift technical performance
Performance 10 points behind
Why: Speed or rendering signals lag behind the competing domain and may hold back SEO quality.
Do next: Improve Core Web Vitals, image delivery and frontend payload before the next refresh.
Metric imagemagick.org Winner github.io
Estimated Value $97,851,301 github.io $764,815,587
Daily Visitors 8,286 github.io 200,780
Daily Pageviews 29,001 github.io 702,730
Daily Income $261 github.io $21,082
SEO Score 89 imagemagick.org 83
Indexability 90 github.io 100
OnPage 93 imagemagick.org 68
Performance 100 imagemagick.org 90
Trust 65 — 65
Coverage 100 — 100
Confidence 100 — 100
SEO Freshness (h) 307 github.io 14
Country United States — United States
TLD org — io
Category — — Technology
Registrar Squarespace Domains II LLC — —
Internal Links 61 imagemagick.org 2
Structured Data Blocks 1 — 1
PageSpeed Mobile 94 imagemagick.org 59
PageSpeed Desktop 100 imagemagick.org 76
PageRank 5 imagemagick.org 4
Tranco Rank #3,156 github.io #126
SSL Grade A — A
Safety Status — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

imagemagick.org
89/100
Pass 9 Warn 2 Fail 0 IDX 90 ONP 93 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Missing Warn
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
45 Pass
Description Length
182 Warn
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
0/2 Pass
github.io
83/100
Pass 8 Warn 3 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 68 PERF 90 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
3 Warn
Title Length
139 Warn
Description Length
124 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Missing Warn
Image Alt Coverage
0/13 Pass

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Publish XML sitemap
MEDIUM Impact 7 Effort S Confidence 84% Focus area imagemagick.org
A: 7 | B: 0
Why it matters: A sitemap improves URL discovery and recrawl efficiency.
Recommended fix: Generate /sitemap.xml, include canonical URLs, and keep it auto-updated.
Improve PageSpeed performance
MEDIUM Impact 6 Effort M Confidence 88% Focus area github.io
A: 0 | B: 6
Why it matters: Low performance can reduce rankings, engagement, and conversion.
Recommended fix: Optimize render-blocking resources, image delivery, caching, and script payload size.
Improve First Contentful Paint
MEDIUM Impact 5 Effort M Confidence 82% Focus area github.io
A: 0 | B: 5
Why it matters: Slow first paint delays visible feedback for users.
Recommended fix: Reduce critical CSS/JS, inline essential styles, and improve server/cache latency.
Reduce to a single primary H1
MEDIUM Impact 5 Effort S Confidence 82% Focus area github.io
A: 0 | B: 5
Why it matters: Multiple H1 tags can blur content hierarchy.
Recommended fix: Keep one main H1 and move secondary section titles to H2/H3.

Next discovery paths

Use the compared signals to branch into broader hub pages and high-value SEO opportunity sets.

Meta Hubs →

Recently Compared

Popular Comparisons