7,596 domains analyzed · 20 categories · Free & instant reports
websitevalue.me

Compare Domains

Compare website value, traffic, SEO and hosting signals side by side.

Browse Rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

github.io 2 imagemagick.org 2
:lane is currently balanced
Both domains perform similarly across the weighted signals in this lane.
Business: github.io Reach: github.io SEO: imagemagick.org Performance: imagemagick.org Trust: Balanced
Business
github.io
github.io
5
imagemagick.org
0
Value gap $666,964,285
Income gap $20,821
Reach
github.io
github.io
3
imagemagick.org
0
Visitors gap 192,494
Pageviews gap 673,729
SEO
imagemagick.org
github.io
1
imagemagick.org
4
Seo gap 6.0
Indexability gap 10
Performance
imagemagick.org
github.io
0
imagemagick.org
4
Performance gap 10
Mobile speed gap 31
Trust
Balanced
github.io
0
imagemagick.org
0

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

github.io
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
4 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 6 points to match
Why: imagemagick.org trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 25 points behind
Why: imagemagick.org has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
Lift technical performance
Performance 10 points behind
Why: Speed or rendering signals lag behind the competing domain and may hold back SEO quality.
Do next: Improve Core Web Vitals, image delivery and frontend payload before the next refresh.
imagemagick.org
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
2 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve indexability signals
Indexability 10 points behind
Why: :domain is behind on crawlability or indexability checks that directly affect discoverability.
Do next: Fix robots, sitemap, canonical and index directives so the homepage is cleanly discoverable.
Metric github.io Winner imagemagick.org
Estimated Value $764,815,587 github.io $97,851,301
Daily Visitors 200,780 github.io 8,286
Daily Pageviews 702,730 github.io 29,001
Daily Income $21,082 github.io $261
SEO Score 83 imagemagick.org 89
Indexability 100 github.io 90
OnPage 68 imagemagick.org 93
Performance 90 imagemagick.org 100
Trust 65 — 65
Coverage 100 — 100
Confidence 100 — 100
SEO Freshness (h) 25 github.io 318
Country United States — United States
TLD io — org
Category Technology — —
Registrar — — Squarespace Domains II LLC
Internal Links 2 imagemagick.org 61
Structured Data Blocks 1 — 1
PageSpeed Mobile 63 imagemagick.org 94
PageSpeed Desktop 84 imagemagick.org 100
PageRank 4 imagemagick.org 5
Tranco Rank #126 github.io #3,156
SSL Grade A — A
Safety Status — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

github.io
83/100
Pass 8 Warn 3 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 68 PERF 90 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
3 Warn
Title Length
139 Warn
Description Length
124 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Missing Warn
Image Alt Coverage
0/13 Pass
imagemagick.org
89/100
Pass 9 Warn 2 Fail 0 IDX 90 ONP 93 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Missing Warn
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
45 Pass
Description Length
182 Warn
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
0/2 Pass

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Publish XML sitemap
MEDIUM Impact 7 Effort S Confidence 84% Focus area imagemagick.org
A: 0 | B: 7
Why it matters: A sitemap improves URL discovery and recrawl efficiency.
Recommended fix: Generate /sitemap.xml, include canonical URLs, and keep it auto-updated.
Improve PageSpeed performance
MEDIUM Impact 6 Effort M Confidence 88% Focus area github.io
A: 6 | B: 0
Why it matters: Low performance can reduce rankings, engagement, and conversion.
Recommended fix: Optimize render-blocking resources, image delivery, caching, and script payload size.
Improve First Contentful Paint
MEDIUM Impact 5 Effort M Confidence 82% Focus area github.io
A: 5 | B: 0
Why it matters: Slow first paint delays visible feedback for users.
Recommended fix: Reduce critical CSS/JS, inline essential styles, and improve server/cache latency.
Reduce to a single primary H1
MEDIUM Impact 5 Effort S Confidence 82% Focus area github.io
A: 5 | B: 0
Why it matters: Multiple H1 tags can blur content hierarchy.
Recommended fix: Keep one main H1 and move secondary section titles to H2/H3.

Next discovery paths

Use the compared signals to branch into broader hub pages and high-value SEO opportunity sets.

Meta Hubs →

Recently Compared

Popular Comparisons