7,596 domains analyzed · 20 categories · Free & instant reports

Compare Domains

Compare website value, traffic, SEO and hosting signals side by side.

Browse Rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

cursor.sh 2 supabase.co 1
cursor.sh leads in :lane
cursor.sh wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business: cursor.sh Reach: cursor.sh SEO: supabase.co Performance: Balanced Trust: Balanced
Business
cursor.sh
cursor.sh
5
supabase.co
0
Value gap $102,540,377
Income gap $616
Reach
cursor.sh
cursor.sh
3
supabase.co
0
Visitors gap 19,555
Pageviews gap 68,443
SEO
supabase.co
cursor.sh
0
supabase.co
4
Seo gap 4.0
Onpage gap 13
Performance
Balanced
cursor.sh
0
supabase.co
0
Trust
Balanced
cursor.sh
0
supabase.co
0

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

cursor.sh
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
4 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 4 points to match
Why: supabase.co trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 13 points behind
Why: supabase.co has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
Expand structured data coverage
Structured data 2 schema blocks behind
Why: supabase.co uses more structured data blocks, which can improve machine understanding and rich result coverage.
Do next: Add clean schema markup for the brand, organization and key page entities.
supabase.co
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
2 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve internal linking depth
Architecture 71 internal links behind
Why: The competing domain exposes more internal links from the homepage and looks easier to crawl.
Do next: Expose more important pages through clearer internal links and navigation paths.
Metric cursor.sh Winner supabase.co
Estimated Value $217,302,280 cursor.sh $114,761,903
Daily Visitors 32,351 cursor.sh 12,796
Daily Pageviews 113,229 cursor.sh 44,786
Daily Income $1,019 cursor.sh $403
SEO Score 88 supabase.co 92
Indexability 100 — 100
OnPage 78 supabase.co 91
Performance 100 — 100
Trust 65 — 65
Coverage 90 — 90
Confidence 91 — 91
SEO Freshness (h) 276 supabase.co 35
Country United States — United States
TLD sh — co
Category — — —
Registrar — — —
Internal Links 146 cursor.sh 75
Structured Data Blocks 2 supabase.co 4
PageSpeed Mobile — — —
PageSpeed Desktop — — —
PageRank 4 cursor.sh 3
Tranco Rank #782 cursor.sh #1,088
SSL Grade A — A
Safety Status — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

cursor.sh
88/100
Pass 9 Warn 2 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 78 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
2 Warn
Title Length
56 Pass
Description Length
129 Pass
HTML lang
en-US Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
36/52 Warn
supabase.co
92/100
Pass 10 Warn 1 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 91 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
44 Pass
Description Length
159 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
6/57 Warn

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve image ALT coverage
HIGH Impact 8 Effort M Confidence 84% Focus area cursor.sh
A: 8 | B: 5
Why it matters: Missing ALT text reduces accessibility and image search context.
Recommended fix: Add concise descriptive ALT text for informative images and empty ALT for decorative assets.
Reduce to a single primary H1
MEDIUM Impact 5 Effort S Confidence 82% Focus area cursor.sh
A: 5 | B: 0
Why it matters: Multiple H1 tags can blur content hierarchy.
Recommended fix: Keep one main H1 and move secondary section titles to H2/H3.

Next discovery paths

Use the compared signals to branch into broader hub pages and high-value SEO opportunity sets.

Meta Hubs →