7,590 domains analyzed · 20 categories · Free & instant reports

Compare Domains

Compare website value, traffic, SEO and hosting signals side by side.

Browse Rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

bing.com 3 fastly.net 1
bing.com leads in :lane
bing.com wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business: fastly.net Reach: bing.com SEO: bing.com Performance: Balanced Trust: bing.com
Business
fastly.net
bing.com
0
fastly.net
5
Value gap $480,741,388
Income gap $41,397
Reach
bing.com
bing.com
3
fastly.net
0
Visitors gap 43,807
Pageviews gap 3,603,083
SEO
bing.com
bing.com
3
fastly.net
1
Seo gap 2.0
Onpage gap 10
Performance
Balanced
bing.com
2
fastly.net
2
Performance gap 25
Mobile speed gap 3.0
Trust
bing.com
bing.com
1
fastly.net
0
Ssl gap 1 SSL

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

bing.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
3 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 10 points behind
Why: fastly.net has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
Improve internal linking depth
Architecture 39 internal links behind
Why: The competing domain exposes more internal links from the homepage and looks easier to crawl.
Do next: Expose more important pages through clearer internal links and navigation paths.
fastly.net
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
2 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Lift technical performance
Performance 25 points behind
Why: Speed or rendering signals lag behind the competing domain and may hold back SEO quality.
Do next: Improve Core Web Vitals, image delivery and frontend payload before the next refresh.
Metric bing.com Winner fastly.net
Estimated Value $848,077,830 fastly.net $1,328,819,218
Daily Visitors 766,613 bing.com 722,806
Daily Pageviews 6,132,904 bing.com 2,529,821
Daily Income $34,498 fastly.net $75,895
SEO Score 86 bing.com 84
Indexability 100 — 100
OnPage 71 fastly.net 81
Performance 100 bing.com 75
Trust 65 — 65
Coverage 100 — 100
Confidence 100 — 100
SEO Freshness (h) 453 bing.com 513
Country United States — Canada
TLD com — net
Category Adult — Technology
Registrar MarkMonitor Inc. — MarkMonitor Inc.
Internal Links 16 fastly.net 55
Structured Data Blocks 0 — 0
PageSpeed Mobile 67 fastly.net 70
PageSpeed Desktop 52 fastly.net 70
PageRank 5 bing.com 3
Tranco Rank #33 bing.com #35
SSL Grade A — B
Safety Status — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

bing.com
86/100
Pass 10 Warn 1 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 71 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
23 Pass
Description Length
168 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
1/2 Warn
fastly.net
84/100
Pass 10 Warn 1 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 81 PERF 75 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
42 Pass
Description Length
163 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
12/13 Warn

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve image ALT coverage
HIGH Impact 8 Effort M Confidence 84% Focus area Both
A: 8 | B: 8
Why it matters: Missing ALT text reduces accessibility and image search context.
Recommended fix: Add concise descriptive ALT text for informative images and empty ALT for decorative assets.
Improve Largest Contentful Paint
MEDIUM Impact 7 Effort L Confidence 86% Focus area fastly.net
A: 0 | B: 7
Why it matters: High LCP harms perceived load speed and Core Web Vitals.
Recommended fix: Prioritize above-the-fold assets, compress hero media, and optimize server response.
Increase homepage content depth
MEDIUM Impact 6 Effort M Confidence 79% Focus area bing.com
A: 6 | B: 0
Why it matters: Thin content limits topical coverage and relevance context.
Recommended fix: Expand helpful unique copy that answers key user questions and links to deeper pages.
Improve PageSpeed performance
MEDIUM Impact 6 Effort M Confidence 88% Focus area Both
A: 6 | B: 6
Why it matters: Low performance can reduce rankings, engagement, and conversion.
Recommended fix: Optimize render-blocking resources, image delivery, caching, and script payload size.