7,526 domains analyzed · 20 categories · Free & instant reports

Compare Domains

Compare website value, traffic, SEO and hosting signals side by side.

Browse Rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

aptoide.com 3 r-project.org 1
aptoide.com leads in :lane
aptoide.com wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business: aptoide.com Reach: r-project.org SEO: aptoide.com Performance: aptoide.com Trust: Balanced
Business
aptoide.com
aptoide.com
3
r-project.org
2
Value gap $10,608
Income gap $11
Reach
r-project.org
aptoide.com
0
r-project.org
3
Visitors gap 359
Pageviews gap 1,257
SEO
aptoide.com
aptoide.com
5
r-project.org
0
Seo gap 21
Indexability gap 35
Performance
aptoide.com
aptoide.com
2
r-project.org
0
Performance gap 10
Trust
Balanced
aptoide.com
0
r-project.org
0

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

aptoide.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
1 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
r-project.org
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
4 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 21 points to match
Why: aptoide.com trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Improve indexability signals
Indexability 35 points behind
Why: :domain is behind on crawlability or indexability checks that directly affect discoverability.
Do next: Fix robots, sitemap, canonical and index directives so the homepage is cleanly discoverable.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 21 points behind
Why: aptoide.com has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
Metric aptoide.com Winner r-project.org
Estimated Value $62,836,401 aptoide.com $62,825,793
Daily Visitors 4,070 r-project.org 4,429
Daily Pageviews 14,245 r-project.org 15,502
Daily Income $128 r-project.org $140
SEO Score 90 aptoide.com 69
Indexability 100 aptoide.com 65
OnPage 83 aptoide.com 62
Performance 100 aptoide.com 90
Trust 65 — 65
Coverage 90 — 90
Confidence 91 r-project.org 93
SEO Freshness (h) 60 aptoide.com 77
Country Ireland — Austria
TLD com — org
Category — — —
Registrar eNom, LLC — Gandi SAS
Internal Links 141 aptoide.com 40
Structured Data Blocks 2 aptoide.com 0
PageSpeed Mobile — r-project.org 57
PageSpeed Desktop — r-project.org 90
PageRank 4 r-project.org 4
Tranco Rank #6,141 r-project.org #5,282
SSL Grade A — A
Safety Status — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

aptoide.com
90/100
Pass 10 Warn 1 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 83 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
43 Pass
Description Length
97 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
41/213 Warn
r-project.org
69/100
Pass 7 Warn 3 Fail 1 IDX 65 ONP 62 PERF 90 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Missing Warn
sitemap.xml
Missing Warn
Canonical URL
Missing Warn
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
42 Pass
Description Length
0 Fail
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
0/1 Pass

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Add meta description
HIGH Impact 10 Effort S Confidence 91% Focus area r-project.org
A: 0 | B: 10
Why it matters: Missing descriptions reduce control of SERP snippets.
Recommended fix: Add a compelling meta description with clear value proposition and intent match.
Add robots.txt
MEDIUM Impact 7 Effort S Confidence 85% Focus area r-project.org
A: 0 | B: 7
Why it matters: robots.txt helps crawlers understand allowed paths and improves crawl clarity.
Recommended fix: Create /robots.txt with allowed sections and a sitemap reference.
Publish XML sitemap
MEDIUM Impact 7 Effort S Confidence 84% Focus area r-project.org
A: 0 | B: 7
Why it matters: A sitemap improves URL discovery and recrawl efficiency.
Recommended fix: Generate /sitemap.xml, include canonical URLs, and keep it auto-updated.
Increase homepage content depth
MEDIUM Impact 6 Effort M Confidence 79% Focus area Both
A: 6 | B: 6
Why it matters: Thin content limits topical coverage and relevance context.
Recommended fix: Expand helpful unique copy that answers key user questions and links to deeper pages.