7,595 domains analyzed · 20 categories · Free & instant reports

Compare Domains

Compare website value, traffic, SEO and hosting signals side by side.

Browse Rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

appcenter.ms 2 microsoft.com 2
:lane is currently balanced
Both domains perform similarly across the weighted signals in this lane.
Business: microsoft.com Reach: microsoft.com SEO: appcenter.ms Performance: appcenter.ms Trust: Balanced
Business
microsoft.com
appcenter.ms
0
microsoft.com
5
Value gap $2,751,486,881
Income gap $441,722
Reach
microsoft.com
appcenter.ms
0
microsoft.com
3
Visitors gap 4,184,708
Pageviews gap 14,646,478
SEO
appcenter.ms
appcenter.ms
4
microsoft.com
0
Seo gap 30
Onpage gap 54
Performance
appcenter.ms
appcenter.ms
2
microsoft.com
0
Performance gap 70
Trust
Balanced
appcenter.ms
0
microsoft.com
0

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

appcenter.ms
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
2 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve internal linking depth
Architecture 97 internal links behind
Why: The competing domain exposes more internal links from the homepage and looks easier to crawl.
Do next: Expose more important pages through clearer internal links and navigation paths.
microsoft.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
4 priorities
Remove noindex directive
Indexability Gain about 25 priority points
Why: noindex prevents pages from being included in search results.
Do next: Remove noindex from meta robots or response headers on indexable pages.
Lift technical performance
Performance 70 points behind
Why: Speed or rendering signals lag behind the competing domain and may hold back SEO quality.
Do next: Improve Core Web Vitals, image delivery and frontend payload before the next refresh.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 30 points to match
Why: appcenter.ms trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 54 points behind
Why: appcenter.ms has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
Metric appcenter.ms Winner microsoft.com
Estimated Value $215,005,897 microsoft.com $2,966,492,779
Daily Visitors 31,662 microsoft.com 4,216,370
Daily Pageviews 110,817 microsoft.com 14,757,295
Daily Income $997 microsoft.com $442,719
SEO Score 75 appcenter.ms 45
Indexability 65 — 65
OnPage 76 appcenter.ms 22
Performance 100 appcenter.ms 30
Trust 65 — 65
Coverage 86 microsoft.com 90
Confidence 88 microsoft.com 93
SEO Freshness (h) 40 appcenter.ms 129
Country South Africa — South Africa
TLD ms — com
Category — — Technology
Registrar MarkMonitor — MarkMonitor Inc.
Internal Links 6 microsoft.com 103
Structured Data Blocks 0 — 0
PageSpeed Mobile — microsoft.com 48
PageSpeed Desktop — microsoft.com 48
PageRank 4 microsoft.com 6
Tranco Rank #799 microsoft.com #6
SSL Grade A — A
Safety Status — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

appcenter.ms
75/100
Pass 8 Warn 3 Fail 0 IDX 65 ONP 76 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Missing Warn
sitemap.xml
Missing Warn
Canonical URL
Missing Warn
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
63 Pass
Description Length
70 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
0/7 Pass
microsoft.com
45/100
Pass 4 Warn 4 Fail 3 IDX 65 ONP 22 PERF 30 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Noindex Fail
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Missing Warn
H1 Count
0 Fail
Title Length
93 Warn
Description Length
0 Fail
HTML lang
en-us Pass
Viewport Meta
Missing Warn
Image Alt Coverage
2/2 Warn

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Remove noindex directive
CRITICAL Impact 25 Effort S Confidence 95% Focus area microsoft.com
A: 0 | B: 25
Why it matters: noindex prevents pages from being included in search results.
Recommended fix: Remove noindex from meta robots or response headers on indexable pages.
Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve PageSpeed performance
HIGH Impact 12 Effort L Confidence 88% Focus area microsoft.com
A: 0 | B: 12
Why it matters: Low performance can reduce rankings, engagement, and conversion.
Recommended fix: Optimize render-blocking resources, image delivery, caching, and script payload size.
Add meta description
HIGH Impact 10 Effort S Confidence 91% Focus area microsoft.com
A: 0 | B: 10
Why it matters: Missing descriptions reduce control of SERP snippets.
Recommended fix: Add a compelling meta description with clear value proposition and intent match.
Add one H1 heading
HIGH Impact 10 Effort S Confidence 90% Focus area microsoft.com
A: 0 | B: 10
Why it matters: Missing H1 weakens topical hierarchy for users and crawlers.
Recommended fix: Add exactly one descriptive H1 aligned with page intent.