7,596 domains analyzed · 20 categories · Free & instant reports

Compare Domains

Compare website value, traffic, SEO and hosting signals side by side.

Browse Rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

tufts.edu 0 linktr.ee 5
linktr.ee leads in :lane
linktr.ee wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business: linktr.ee Reach: linktr.ee SEO: linktr.ee Performance: linktr.ee Trust: linktr.ee
Business
linktr.ee
tufts.edu
0
linktr.ee
5
Value gap $312,921,701
Income gap $2,695
Reach
linktr.ee
tufts.edu
0
linktr.ee
3
Visitors gap 85,565
Pageviews gap 299,477
SEO
linktr.ee
tufts.edu
0
linktr.ee
4
Seo gap 22
Onpage gap 26
Performance
linktr.ee
tufts.edu
0
linktr.ee
3
Performance gap 70
Mobile speed gap 17
Trust
linktr.ee
tufts.edu
0
linktr.ee
1
Ssl gap 1 SSL

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

tufts.edu
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
4 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Lift technical performance
Performance 70 points behind
Why: Speed or rendering signals lag behind the competing domain and may hold back SEO quality.
Do next: Improve Core Web Vitals, image delivery and frontend payload before the next refresh.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 22 points to match
Why: linktr.ee trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 26 points behind
Why: linktr.ee has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
linktr.ee
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
2 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve internal linking depth
Architecture 48 internal links behind
Why: The competing domain exposes more internal links from the homepage and looks easier to crawl.
Do next: Expose more important pages through clearer internal links and navigation paths.
Metric tufts.edu Winner linktr.ee
Estimated Value $90,922,818 linktr.ee $403,844,519
Daily Visitors 7,443 linktr.ee 93,008
Daily Pageviews 26,051 linktr.ee 325,528
Daily Income $234 linktr.ee $2,930
SEO Score 68 linktr.ee 90
Indexability 100 — 100
OnPage 65 linktr.ee 91
Performance 20 linktr.ee 90
Trust 65 — 65
Coverage 100 tufts.edu 95
Confidence 100 tufts.edu 96
SEO Freshness (h) 22 tufts.edu 307
Country Canada — Canada
TLD edu — ee
Category — — —
Registrar — — —
Internal Links 149 tufts.edu 101
Structured Data Blocks 1 linktr.ee 3
PageSpeed Mobile 44 linktr.ee 61
PageSpeed Desktop 44 tufts.edu —
PageRank 4 linktr.ee 7
Tranco Rank #3,708 linktr.ee #272
SSL Grade B — A
Safety Status — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

tufts.edu
68/100
Pass 9 Warn 1 Fail 1 IDX 100 ONP 65 PERF 20 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
0 Fail
Title Length
16 Warn
Description Length
121 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
0/20 Pass
linktr.ee
90/100
Pass 10 Warn 1 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 91 PERF 90 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
67 Pass
Description Length
142 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
35/63 Warn

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve PageSpeed performance
HIGH Impact 12 Effort L Confidence 88% Focus area tufts.edu
A: 12 | B: 6
Why it matters: Low performance can reduce rankings, engagement, and conversion.
Recommended fix: Optimize render-blocking resources, image delivery, caching, and script payload size.
Add one H1 heading
HIGH Impact 10 Effort S Confidence 90% Focus area tufts.edu
A: 10 | B: 0
Why it matters: Missing H1 weakens topical hierarchy for users and crawlers.
Recommended fix: Add exactly one descriptive H1 aligned with page intent.
Improve image ALT coverage
HIGH Impact 8 Effort M Confidence 84% Focus area linktr.ee
A: 0 | B: 8
Why it matters: Missing ALT text reduces accessibility and image search context.
Recommended fix: Add concise descriptive ALT text for informative images and empty ALT for decorative assets.
Improve Largest Contentful Paint
MEDIUM Impact 7 Effort L Confidence 86% Focus area tufts.edu
A: 7 | B: 0
Why it matters: High LCP harms perceived load speed and Core Web Vitals.
Recommended fix: Prioritize above-the-fold assets, compress hero media, and optimize server response.