7,595 domains analyzed · 20 categories · Free & instant reports

Compare Domains

Compare website value, traffic, SEO and hosting signals side by side.

Browse Rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

trustarc.com 1 berkeley.edu 2
berkeley.edu leads in :lane
berkeley.edu wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business: berkeley.edu Reach: berkeley.edu SEO: trustarc.com Performance: Balanced Trust: Balanced
Business
berkeley.edu
trustarc.com
0
berkeley.edu
5
Value gap $121,167,437
Income gap $871
Reach
berkeley.edu
trustarc.com
0
berkeley.edu
3
Visitors gap 27,656
Pageviews gap 96,796
SEO
trustarc.com
trustarc.com
4
berkeley.edu
0
Seo gap 7.0
Onpage gap 25
Performance
Balanced
trustarc.com
0
berkeley.edu
0
Trust
Balanced
trustarc.com
0
berkeley.edu
0

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

trustarc.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
1 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
berkeley.edu
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
4 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 7 points to match
Why: trustarc.com trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 25 points behind
Why: trustarc.com has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
Improve internal linking depth
Architecture 36 internal links behind
Why: The competing domain exposes more internal links from the homepage and looks easier to crawl.
Do next: Expose more important pages through clearer internal links and navigation paths.
Metric trustarc.com Winner berkeley.edu
Estimated Value $151,541,418 berkeley.edu $272,708,855
Daily Visitors 13,749 berkeley.edu 41,405
Daily Pageviews 48,122 berkeley.edu 144,918
Daily Income $433 berkeley.edu $1,304
SEO Score 92 trustarc.com 85
Indexability 100 — 100
OnPage 91 trustarc.com 66
Performance 100 — 100
Trust 65 — 65
Coverage 90 — 90
Confidence 91 — 91
SEO Freshness (h) 392 berkeley.edu 35
Country United States — United States
TLD com — edu
Category — — —
Registrar GoDaddy.com, LLC — —
Internal Links 129 trustarc.com 93
Structured Data Blocks 2 trustarc.com 1
PageSpeed Mobile — — —
PageSpeed Desktop — — —
PageRank 5 berkeley.edu 5
Tranco Rank #1,844 berkeley.edu #611
SSL Grade A — A
Safety Status — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

trustarc.com
92/100
Pass 10 Warn 1 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 91 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
59 Pass
Description Length
146 Pass
HTML lang
en-US Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
31/42 Warn
berkeley.edu
85/100
Pass 9 Warn 2 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 66 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
2 Warn
Title Length
40 Pass
Description Length
128 Pass
HTML lang
en-US Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
12/21 Warn

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve image ALT coverage
HIGH Impact 8 Effort M Confidence 84% Focus area Both
A: 8 | B: 8
Why it matters: Missing ALT text reduces accessibility and image search context.
Recommended fix: Add concise descriptive ALT text for informative images and empty ALT for decorative assets.
Increase homepage content depth
MEDIUM Impact 6 Effort M Confidence 79% Focus area berkeley.edu
A: 0 | B: 6
Why it matters: Thin content limits topical coverage and relevance context.
Recommended fix: Expand helpful unique copy that answers key user questions and links to deeper pages.
Reduce to a single primary H1
MEDIUM Impact 5 Effort S Confidence 82% Focus area berkeley.edu
A: 0 | B: 5
Why it matters: Multiple H1 tags can blur content hierarchy.
Recommended fix: Keep one main H1 and move secondary section titles to H2/H3.
Complete Open Graph metadata
MEDIUM Impact 4 Effort S Confidence 81% Focus area berkeley.edu
A: 0 | B: 4
Why it matters: Incomplete social tags reduce share-preview quality and consistency.
Recommended fix: Provide og:title, og:description, and og:image with stable canonical URLs.