7,526 domains analyzed · 20 categories · Free & instant reports

Compare Domains

Compare website value, traffic, SEO and hosting signals side by side.

Browse Rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

mimecast.net 1 code42.com 3
code42.com leads in :lane
code42.com wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business: code42.com Reach: code42.com SEO: mimecast.net Performance: Balanced Trust: code42.com
Business
code42.com
mimecast.net
0
code42.com
5
Value gap $8,694,208
Income gap $13
Reach
code42.com
mimecast.net
0
code42.com
3
Visitors gap 421
Pageviews gap 1,473
SEO
mimecast.net
mimecast.net
4
code42.com
0
Seo gap 5.0
Onpage gap 31
Performance
Balanced
mimecast.net
0
code42.com
0
Trust
code42.com
mimecast.net
0
code42.com
2
Trust gap 29

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

mimecast.net
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
2 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Raise trust and safety confidence
Trust 29 points behind
Why: code42.com looks weaker on trust-oriented checks such as HTTPS, SSL quality or safety signals.
Do next: Strengthen HTTPS, certificate quality and surface clearer trust signals across the site.
code42.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
4 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 31 points behind
Why: mimecast.net has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 5 points to match
Why: mimecast.net trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Expand structured data coverage
Structured data 2 schema blocks behind
Why: mimecast.net uses more structured data blocks, which can improve machine understanding and rich result coverage.
Do next: Add clean schema markup for the brand, organization and key page entities.
Metric mimecast.net Winner code42.com
Estimated Value $63,489,662 code42.com $72,183,870
Daily Visitors 4,493 code42.com 4,914
Daily Pageviews 15,726 code42.com 17,199
Daily Income $142 code42.com $155
SEO Score 86 mimecast.net 81
Indexability 100 — 100
OnPage 85 mimecast.net 54
Performance 100 — 100
Trust 36 code42.com 65
Coverage 86 code42.com 90
Confidence 87 code42.com 91
SEO Freshness (h) 1,560 code42.com 123
Country Australia — Australia
TLD net — com
Category — — —
Registrar MarkMonitor Inc. — CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.
Internal Links 66 — 66
Structured Data Blocks 2 mimecast.net 0
PageSpeed Mobile — — —
PageSpeed Desktop — — —
PageRank 1 code42.com 4
Tranco Rank #6,565 code42.com #4,411
SSL Grade A — A
Safety Status — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

mimecast.net
86/100
Pass 11 Warn 0 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 85 PERF 100 TRUST 36
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
1 Pass
Title Length
62 Pass
Description Length
136 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
0/51 Pass
code42.com
81/100
Pass 9 Warn 2 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 54 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
2 Warn
Title Length
67 Pass
Description Length
102 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
1/29 Warn

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Increase homepage content depth
MEDIUM Impact 6 Effort M Confidence 79% Focus area Both
A: 6 | B: 6
Why it matters: Thin content limits topical coverage and relevance context.
Recommended fix: Expand helpful unique copy that answers key user questions and links to deeper pages.
Reduce to a single primary H1
MEDIUM Impact 5 Effort S Confidence 82% Focus area code42.com
A: 0 | B: 5
Why it matters: Multiple H1 tags can blur content hierarchy.
Recommended fix: Keep one main H1 and move secondary section titles to H2/H3.
Improve image ALT coverage
MEDIUM Impact 5 Effort M Confidence 84% Focus area code42.com
A: 0 | B: 5
Why it matters: Missing ALT text reduces accessibility and image search context.
Recommended fix: Add concise descriptive ALT text for informative images and empty ALT for decorative assets.
Add structured data
MEDIUM Impact 5 Effort M Confidence 80% Focus area code42.com
A: 0 | B: 5
Why it matters: Structured data improves entity clarity and rich-result eligibility.
Recommended fix: Implement relevant JSON-LD schema types (Organization, WebSite, Product, Article, etc.).