Compare Domains
Compare website value, traffic, SEO and hosting signals side by side.
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.
Executive Summary
A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.
mail.com 3
gmx.net 2
mail.com leads in :lane
mail.com wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business:
gmx.net
Reach:
gmx.net
SEO:
mail.com
Performance:
mail.com
Trust:
mail.com
Business
gmx.net
mail.com
0
gmx.net
5
Value gap $27,027,759
Income gap $127
Reach
gmx.net
mail.com
0
gmx.net
3
Visitors gap 4,030
Pageviews gap 14,105
SEO
mail.com
mail.com
5
gmx.net
0
Seo gap 34
Indexability gap 10
Performance
mail.com
mail.com
2
gmx.net
0
Performance gap 100
Trust
mail.com
mail.com
2
gmx.net
0
Trust gap 29
Next Best Moves
The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.
mail.com
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust
Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
gmx.net
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
Lift technical performance
Performance
100 points behind
Why: Speed or rendering signals lag behind the competing domain and may hold back SEO quality.
Do next: Improve Core Web Vitals, image delivery and frontend payload before the next refresh.
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust
Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO
34 points to match
Why: mail.com trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page
21 points behind
Why: mail.com has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
SEO Audit Snapshot
A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.
85/100
Pass 10
Warn 1
Fail 0
IDX 100
ONP 67
PERF 100
TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200
Pass
Indexability
Indexable
Pass
robots.txt
Found
Pass
sitemap.xml
Found
Pass
Canonical URL
Present
Pass
H1 Count
1
Pass
Title Length
48
Pass
Description Length
136
Pass
HTML lang
en
Pass
Viewport Meta
Present
Pass
Image Alt Coverage
2/13
Warn
51/100
Pass 6
Warn 4
Fail 1
IDX 90
ONP 46
PERF 0
TRUST 36
HTTP Status
200
Pass
Indexability
Indexable
Pass
robots.txt
Found
Pass
sitemap.xml
Missing
Warn
Canonical URL
Present
Pass
H1 Count
0
Fail
Title Length
54
Pass
Description Length
133
Pass
HTML lang
Missing
Warn
Viewport Meta
Missing
Warn
Image Alt Coverage
43/119
Warn
Top Levers Across Both Domains
Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.
Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL
Impact 24
Effort L
Confidence 94%
Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Add one H1 heading
HIGH
Impact 10
Effort S
Confidence 90%
Focus area gmx.net
A: 0 | B: 10
Why it matters: Missing H1 weakens topical hierarchy for users and crawlers.
Recommended fix: Add exactly one descriptive H1 aligned with page intent.
Publish XML sitemap
MEDIUM
Impact 7
Effort S
Confidence 84%
Focus area gmx.net
A: 0 | B: 7
Why it matters: A sitemap improves URL discovery and recrawl efficiency.
Recommended fix: Generate /sitemap.xml, include canonical URLs, and keep it auto-updated.
Increase homepage content depth
MEDIUM
Impact 6
Effort M
Confidence 79%
Focus area mail.com
A: 6 | B: 0
Why it matters: Thin content limits topical coverage and relevance context.
Recommended fix: Expand helpful unique copy that answers key user questions and links to deeper pages.
Improve image ALT coverage
MEDIUM
Impact 5
Effort M
Confidence 84%
Focus area Both
A: 5 | B: 5
Why it matters: Missing ALT text reduces accessibility and image search context.
Recommended fix: Add concise descriptive ALT text for informative images and empty ALT for decorative assets.
Next discovery paths
Use the compared signals to branch into broader hub pages and high-value SEO opportunity sets.
Related hubs