7,596 domains analyzed · 20 categories · Free & instant reports

Compare Domains

Compare website value, traffic, SEO and hosting signals side by side.

Browse Rankings
Use this domain comparison to benchmark value, traffic, SEO quality, technical health and trust signals side by side.

Executive Summary

A fast head-to-head view of which domain leads in the areas that matter most.

lichess.org 3 jw.org 1
lichess.org leads in :lane
lichess.org wins this lane with stronger combined signals than :other.
Business: lichess.org Reach: jw.org SEO: lichess.org Performance: lichess.org Trust: Balanced
Business
lichess.org
lichess.org
3
jw.org
2
Value gap $304,387
Income gap $24
Reach
jw.org
lichess.org
0
jw.org
3
Visitors gap 749
Pageviews gap 2,622
SEO
lichess.org
lichess.org
4
jw.org
1
Seo gap 15
Indexability gap 25
Performance
lichess.org
lichess.org
2
jw.org
0
Performance gap 100
Trust
Balanced
lichess.org
0
jw.org
0

Next Best Moves

The clearest actions to close the gap and improve this domain fastest.

lichess.org
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
3 priorities
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Improve indexability signals
Indexability 25 points behind
Why: :domain is behind on crawlability or indexability checks that directly affect discoverability.
Do next: Fix robots, sitemap, canonical and index directives so the homepage is cleanly discoverable.
Improve internal linking depth
Architecture 118 internal links behind
Why: The competing domain exposes more internal links from the homepage and looks easier to crawl.
Do next: Expose more important pages through clearer internal links and navigation paths.
jw.org
Priority is based on the current gap, likely impact and available audit evidence.
4 priorities
Lift technical performance
Performance 100 points behind
Why: Speed or rendering signals lag behind the competing domain and may hold back SEO quality.
Do next: Improve Core Web Vitals, image delivery and frontend payload before the next refresh.
Resolve safety risk signals
Trust Gain about 24 priority points
Why: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Do next: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Close the SEO score gap
SEO 15 points to match
Why: lichess.org trails the competing domain on overall SEO score and needs the fastest high-impact fixes first.
Do next: Prioritize the highest-severity audit fixes and refresh the crawl after each batch.
Strengthen on-page relevance
On-page 12 points behind
Why: lichess.org has weaker title, description, headings or content-depth signals than the competing domain.
Do next: Tighten title/description quality, heading structure and homepage content depth.
Metric lichess.org Winner jw.org
Estimated Value $185,238,109 lichess.org $184,933,722
Daily Visitors 20,618 jw.org 21,367
Daily Pageviews 72,163 jw.org 74,785
Daily Income $649 jw.org $673
SEO Score 76 lichess.org 61
Indexability 75 jw.org 100
OnPage 66 lichess.org 54
Performance 100 lichess.org 0
Trust 65 — 65
Coverage 86 jw.org 90
Confidence 88 jw.org 91
SEO Freshness (h) 307 jw.org 305
Country France — Switzerland
TLD org — org
Category — — —
Registrar OVH sas — Amazon Registrar, Inc.
Internal Links 99 jw.org 217
Structured Data Blocks 0 — 0
PageSpeed Mobile — — —
PageSpeed Desktop — — —
PageRank 5 lichess.org 4
Tranco Rank #1,227 jw.org #1,184
SSL Grade A — A
Safety Status — — —

SEO Audit Snapshot

A compact technical SEO check so users can compare on-page readiness at a glance.

lichess.org
76/100
Pass 7 Warn 3 Fail 1 IDX 75 ONP 66 PERF 100 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Missing Warn
Canonical URL
Missing Warn
H1 Count
0 Fail
Title Length
31 Pass
Description Length
162 Pass
HTML lang
en-US Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
18/18 Warn
jw.org
61/100
Pass 9 Warn 2 Fail 0 IDX 100 ONP 54 PERF 0 TRUST 65
HTTP Status
200 Pass
Indexability
Indexable Pass
robots.txt
Found Pass
sitemap.xml
Found Pass
Canonical URL
Present Pass
H1 Count
3 Warn
Title Length
54 Pass
Description Length
165 Pass
HTML lang
en Pass
Viewport Meta
Present Pass
Image Alt Coverage
11/19 Warn

Top Levers Across Both Domains

Shared high-impact improvements pulled from the latest recommendations and audits.

Resolve safety risk signals
CRITICAL Impact 24 Effort L Confidence 94% Focus area Both
A: 24 | B: 24
Why it matters: Negative safety classification can severely reduce trust and traffic.
Recommended fix: Scan and clean malware/phishing indicators, harden CMS/plugins, and request re-evaluation.
Add one H1 heading
HIGH Impact 10 Effort S Confidence 90% Focus area lichess.org
A: 10 | B: 0
Why it matters: Missing H1 weakens topical hierarchy for users and crawlers.
Recommended fix: Add exactly one descriptive H1 aligned with page intent.
Improve image ALT coverage
HIGH Impact 8 Effort M Confidence 84% Focus area Both
A: 8 | B: 8
Why it matters: Missing ALT text reduces accessibility and image search context.
Recommended fix: Add concise descriptive ALT text for informative images and empty ALT for decorative assets.
Publish XML sitemap
MEDIUM Impact 7 Effort S Confidence 84% Focus area lichess.org
A: 7 | B: 0
Why it matters: A sitemap improves URL discovery and recrawl efficiency.
Recommended fix: Generate /sitemap.xml, include canonical URLs, and keep it auto-updated.
Increase homepage content depth
MEDIUM Impact 6 Effort M Confidence 79% Focus area jw.org
A: 0 | B: 6
Why it matters: Thin content limits topical coverage and relevance context.
Recommended fix: Expand helpful unique copy that answers key user questions and links to deeper pages.